Mar 27 2009

Angie’s Choice; A lonely death, Outside the Law

Tag: Uncategorizedmary @ 3:01 am

Angie’s choice: a death with dignity
Julia Medew
March 25, 2009
Page 2 of 2 | Single Page View
Fearful of the long, arduous deaths she had watched in palliative care units, Ms Belecciu arranged last year with another terminally ill man, Don Flounders, to obtain Nembutal – a potent barbiturate commonly used to euthanase animals.

Restricted by her illness, she paid for some of the costs Mr Flounders and his wife Iris faced to travel to Mexico, where the drug could be purchased over the counter at veterinary clinics. When Mr Flounders arrived with her Nembutal last year, Ms Belecciu said she had never felt more relief: “The weight was gone, my fear was gone.”

But after Mr Flounders made his journey public by talking to Channel Seven, his and Ms Belecciu’s homes were raided by federal police last year. The police did not find their drugs and the case appeared to be closed.

On hearing of Ms Belecciu’s death this week, Mr Flounders said he would not be surprised if he and his wife’s “file” was reopened. “What are they going to do? Put us in prison? I’m bed-ridden most of the time, so it would have to be in hospital, which would make it even worse from a publicity point of view for them,” he said.

Dr Nitschke said although he might also be sailing close to the edge of the law for his organisation’s role in introducing Mr Flounders to Ms Belecciu, he did not think the police would arrest Mr Flounders, who has mesothelioma.

On his own position, Dr Nitschke said he always had legal concerns when interacting with people who were planning their deaths and wanting to tell their story because the laws about what constituted assisted suicide remained vague. “One can make mistakes. I hope we haven’t made any mistakes in this regard,” he said.

Ms Belecciu is the latest in a line of Australians – including Angelique Flowers, Max Bell, Bob Dent, Janet Mills and Lisette Nigot – who have made their deaths public in the hope of forcing a change to Australian laws.

Dr Nitschke said he was not confident the Federal Government or any of the states and territories would be brave enough to change the laws any time soon.

While Greens senator Bob Brown is trying to introduce a bill to allow Australian territories to independently decide their own laws on this issue, Dr Nitschke said it would be a tiny step in the process. “Waiting for politicians or for legislative change is like waiting for bloody hell to freeze over.”

Footnote: I find it quite annoying that articles reporting suicide methods dealing with voluntary euthanasia the key issue, as referring readers to Beyond Blue and Helpline. The media in keeping with government guidelines is not genuinely understanding that any person involving themselves in a hastened death, has no purpose left to live.

A future of continuing deterioration and even more physical and physiological damage is not going to serve them in any way whatsoever.

I too will choose to end my suffering more quickly than the law permits when and if I should ever find myself in the same circumstances as Angie Belecciu. I don’t promote suicide for others to consider, but I most certainly understand the need in a rational human being to be at least given the same options for a good death, as my dog!

We go to jail for not effectively treating an animal with the ultimate relief of pain and yet humans are expected to all suffer based on the few religious and active lobbyists who see a purpose in suffering for their own souls and wish to inflict that rubbish on me.

I resent their interference in my wellbeing and know that one day, simple compassion will overtake the zealots to continue watching others suffer. Give them tea and sympathy but nothing else, the Catholic Church implies! Not so all Churches thank goodness. There are Ministers throughout the Christian world who do understand that tolerance for pain is a very personal matter and not one for others to judge for the individual!

Angie herself was a palliative care nurse and fully understood what was in store for her in the palliative care units which abound in funding every time there is an active push for voluntary euthanasia. The knowledge she gained from her experience ensured that given a choice, she preferred a hastened death.

That she needed to die alone is a tragedy which is abound around Australia. Angie was one of the lucky ones – she had Nembutal which is a painless method of dying. However others less fortunate have to resort to devious means to provoke the successful termination of life, and those in the know, will understand full well, how desperately the body beautiful wants to ’survive’……People try the most gruesome of methods and can yet ’survive’…It is an established fact that people (farmers, policemen) with guns in their mouths can succeed only in blowing away half their face and still the medicos will rehabilitate them. They fail to blow their brains out because of the involuntary tremor of the hand due to the stress related to the action itself…..

Death is a friend to many suffering intolerable pain, and I will welcome it with open arms when I cease to function as a person with the will and the expectations of living a full and contented life.

Angie Belecciu is at peace (half the battle is being able to help oneself before a total breakdown of the body prevents self help being an option)
Angie’s wish: death with dignity
After nearly two decades fighting cancer – and days before she took her own life – Angie Belecciu says Australia needs to rethink its euthanasia laws.


Mar 22 2009

Shared off the Yahoo discussion group

Tag: Uncategorizedmary @ 3:02 am

Euthanasia: A Baptist Minister is leading fellow Christians to legalise voluntary euthanasia.?
..in SA. In our local newspaper:
The Reverend B, a hospital chaplain, said his call was compassionate and “thoroughly consistent with the teachings of Jesus.”

“People talk about the sanctity of life, which sounds nice, but that term was never used in the Bible,” he said yesterday.

“You can quote texts for and against almost any point of view.”

Revd. B stressed he was not speaking for the Baptist Church, but said many Christians across a range of denominations supported legalising voluntary euthanasia. Revd. B said legislation was needed to allow people their choice early, in case their illness later rendered them unable to communicate.

“Some of the most pitiful cases I see are outcomes of accidents,” he said. “People have no prior warning and, after the accident, they’re in no condition to make such a decision.”

Red. B and fellow Baptist Mr W have formed Christians Supporting Choice for Voluntary Euthanasia.

Mr W said politicians needed to know there was a majority support for euthanasia.

“It’s about compassion and love. Most people, regardless of whether they are religious or not, have this innate feeling they don’t want people to suffer at the end of their lives.”

What do you think?

4 weeks ago
Additional Details
Thank you mia delight for your personal experience.

There is another question after this one “What are the Christian teachings of euthanasia?” Where the answers on average are the opposite of those below, and yet the minister referred to above is a Christian…

4 weeks ago


Mar 16 2009

Where’s the Dignity? Judy Tolson asks.

Tag: Uncategorizedmary @ 4:37 pm

Letter in the Age Monday, March 16, 2009

This weekend, I have watched my 96 year old father dying.  He has had a stroke related dementia and lived in a nursing home for three years.   The staff has my absolute admiration, but where is the quality of life and dignity?

He has been bedridden for nine months and spoken very few words in two years.  As he lies in bed with his loving family around hime, I wonder why we treat “man’s best friend” with more dignity than we do my father.

He has lived a great life, been a truly fantastic father and husband.  He is old and it is his time.

I pray that as more of us reach this stage, we have learn to treaty our best friends/soul mates/lovers with more dignity and respect for their wishes.

Lets us treat them more as we do “man’s best friend”.

I do not want my family to see me gasp for my last breath for days on end.  I want them to remember me and let me silently slip away  with the help of the medical profession, free of the threat of litigation.

Judy Tolson, Kew


Mar 16 2009

Impending Death not necessarily “depressing”

Tag: Uncategorizedmary @ 4:23 pm

13 March 2009 from ERGO News List

 

The following letter on Oregon Law research appeared in Psychiatric News March 6, 2009 Volume 44, Number 5, page 24 – 2009 American Psychiatric Association    

 

Study Methodology Questioned

 

The article “Some With Depression Able to Get Assisted Suicide” in the   December 5, 2008, issue addresses a legitimate concern, but the study   being reported on involved a questionable instrument, narrow   interpretation, and biased language.

 

Physician aid-in-dying in Oregon, under the Death With Dignity Act   (DWDA), has been closely observed in the decade of its operation.   Fears that patients without insurance, with chronic disabilities, or   with less education would be pressured into hastening death have   proved groundless. The study in the Psychiatric News report used an   instrument for assessing depression that was neither designed for, nor   tested with, terminally ill patients. The conclusion focuses on three   of 18 patients who tested as depressed, without distinguishing between   clinical depression and competency to decide on end-of-life care. The   authors wrote that because a sixth of the patients manifested signs or   symptoms of depression, increased psychiatric vigilance was needed.

 

In Oregon in 2007, 85 prescriptions to hasten death were written by 45   physicians; of the 85 patients, 46 hastened death, 26 died of illness,   and 13 were alive at the end of the year. These deaths are not   classified as suicide?nor should they be. Assisted suicide is illegal   in every state, including Oregon.

 

Unlike suicidal patients for whom preventive measures are indicated,   these patients want to live but face certain death within months or   weeks. DWDA provides control and reassurance with psychological   benefits: half of those who receive a prescription do not use it.

 

Oregon has excellent end-of-life care, including high rates of hospice   enrollment and death at home?90 percent for DWDA patients. They and   their loved ones, realistically accepting the prognosis, take a   measure of control to achieve a peaceful, dignified ending, which they   urge we not confuse with “assisted suicide.” The term “suicide” is   inapt and pejorative, denigrating both patient and doctor who, in   appropriate circumstance, use a law that is supported by a majority of   Americans and several professional organizations: the American Public   Health Association, the American Women’s Medical Association, and the   American Medical Student Association. Last November a DWDA in   Washington state won handily in a referendum.

 

Over a decade, many observers have found that the Oregon law lessens   depression by empowering patients and may prevent suicide in patients   who have a terminal diagnosis with an unpredictable life expectancy.   How else to explain the fact that 15 of 18 in the study sample did not   test positive for depression, even though they faced imminent death? I   submit that Oregon doctors, two of whom must certify the patient’s   terminal status and mental competence, are able to evaluate competence   and the need for psychiatric consultation. Indeed, psychiatric   consultation would, in many cases, constitute a burden and an insult   to dying patients and their families. Better studies are needed to   weigh the psychiatric benefits along with risks in what is a major   innovation in palliative care.

 

E. James Lieberman, M.D., M.P.H.

Potomac, Md.