Jun 28 2007

The Reverend George David Exoo

Tag: Diarymary @ 6:24 pm

Dear Mary:

Yes, by all means publish the whole thing. 

The timing of this thing has been frustrating, as I must leave for an 11-day trip to South America in just a few hours,.  I’ll have email contact from there, but can only check mail once a day.

God bless you and your work.  The newslist will be posting all my updates, as well as what I put on the main website, www.compassionate-chaplaincy.com.

Please spread the word to all other pro-euthanasia websites worldwide to publish the URL www.compassionate-chaplaincy.com, so they can keep up on things, too.

This is a real tragedy.

Thanks again –

Dick

Choice Comments:

And what I sought permission to copy is a follows:   Of special interest to me of course is that the subject of the FBI’s unwelcomed attention is a Man of God no less!

The Reverend George David Exoo
And the Death With Dignity Movement
Copyright (c) 2007 by By Richard N. Côté.
Contact the author at dickcote@earthlink.net or (843) 881-6080 for further information.
Revised June 27, 2007, 8:40 p.m.

On Monday morning, June 25, 2007, The Reverend George David Exoo, a Unitarian minister and euthanasia (literal meaning: “good death”) advocate living in Beckley, West Virginia, was arrested by FBI agents and taken to the Southern Regional Jail, near Beckley. There he was booked and jailed, pending a hearing on Friday, June 29, at 2:30 at the Federal Building in Beckley. At that time it will be determined if he is eligible for bond while awaiting legal proceedings to determine if there are any legal grounds for his extradition to Ireland.

Irish police want to prosecute Exoo for his role in the suicide death of Rosemary Toole (formally known as Rosemary Elizabeth Toole Gilhooly), a 48-year-old Irish woman who suffered from the debilitating effects of Cushing’s Syndrome and profound depression. Toole ended her life by taking a massive overdose of sleeping pills mixed with alcohol and by inhaling helium gas. This method of suicide, which Ms. Toole chose to employ, is explained in the international best-selling book, Final Exit, by Derek Humphry, founder of The Hemlock Society USA.

Exoo denies that he took any active role in Toole’s suicide, stating that he broke no laws by providing her with suicide counseling, observing her death, and providing a compassionate presence as she carried out her last wishes by her own hand. He will contest any attempts to extradite him.

Many people are faced with a beloved friend or family member who is in unending, unendurable pain; trapped in a ruined body; terminally ill; or just old, fragile, and tired of life and wants to make a swift, painless departure from this earth by their own hand, while they still have the ability to control the last days of their life. If you were the person with such a friend or family member, would you help them if they begged for your help? The information presented here will give journalists and others who are interested in The Reverend Exoo and this euthanasia case reliable information about both topics.

George Exoo biographical sketch
At various stages of his career, The Reverend George David Exoo has led the life of a Harvard Divinity School religious scholar, a college sociology professor, a Unitarian-Universalist parish minister, a vocal and energetically involved social activist, and an insightful reviewer of religious congregations nationwide. As the director of The Compassionate Chaplaincy Foundation, a non-profit, charitable organization headquartered in Beckley, West Virginia, he has advised and given spiritual counseling to more than one hundred people who chose to end their own lives in dignity at the time and place of their choosing. As a result, he has become one of the most active, high-profile members of the U.S. and international right-to-die movement.

Childhood
George David Exoo, the only child of George Exoo, Sr., and his wife, Gertrude Sarah (Snyder) Exoo, was born in Lakewood Hospital, Lakewood, Ohio, on August 22, 1942. His father’s ancestors emigrated from Holland; his mother’s, from Germany. The family attended the Brecksville (Ohio) United Methodist Church. A bright, talented boy with a big grin, Exoo excelled in his studies, got along well with his classmates, and quickly learned to play the violin.

Education
Exoo graduated magna cum laude from Emerson College in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1964, where he majored in English and social science. In 1966-1967, he was named a Hopkins Fellow, and in 1967 he received his S.T.B. (Bachelor of Sacred Theology) degree from Harvard Divinity School. At the Graduate Theological Union of the University of California at Berkeley, he pursued a Ph.D. in religion and society, with emphasis on the works of Ernst Troelltsch; Max Weber; religious experience; and law, morals, and the legal process. His doctoral dissertation was titled “Music as a Language of Spirituality in the War Years: Compositions of Ralph Vaughan Williams.”

Career
After leaving Berkeley, Exoo became a professor of sociology on the sociology faculty at Raymond College of the University of the Pacific, Stockton, California (1962-63), and later filled the same role at Washington and Jefferson College, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (1973-1976). Exoo found academic life stimulating, but he felt a deeper need to become involved directly with the community. Exoo was ordained as a minister by the Unitarian-Universalist Association in 1973, and his interests in social action soon surfaced.

Parish ministry
In 1977, he was called to the historic pulpit of the Unitarian Church of Charleston, South Carolina, founded in 1772, and the oldest Unitarian congregation in the South. The church was an anachronism: a bastion of liberal, inclusive theology in a state known for its rock-ribbed Christian orthodoxy. In Charleston, Exoo gained considerable attention on several fronts. His love for musicology greatly enhanced the sophistication of the congregation’s choir and organ repertoires.

The aging congregation he inherited had not experienced any significant growth in many years, and Exoo undertook a number of successful (and, to some, controversial) efforts to expand and broaden the membership base. These included organizing Charleston’s first church-supported singles’ group, known as “New Wine”; encouraged the development of a support group for gays and lesbians; and of actively supporting of civil and religious liberties. He also served as chaplain/advisor to On Our Own, a union of formerly hospitalized mental patients in Charleston. At the denominational level, he was a member of the Unitarian-Universalist Gay/Lesbian Task Force.

In addition, Exoo performed an active role in expanding interfaith ties between Charleston’s Unitarian, Jewish, and African-American congregations. This work led to his being elected to two terms as president of The Charleston Ministerial Association, an organization whose membership consisted chiefly of ministers of black congregations. He served the greater Charleston community as an unpaid chaplain for the Charleston Police Department for many years, counseling victims of tragedy who were suffering trauma and personal loss. Exoo also actively lobbied for the 1985 passage in South Carolina of Living Will legislation and infant auto seat legislation.

AIDS activism
One of Exoo’s most energetic campaigns was a lifelong fight for AIDS education and prevention, in which he was an early, active, and highly vocal leader. He served as a media advocate for the AIDS Interfaith Ministry in South Carolina from 1989 to 1990; served as chair of The AIDS Response Task Force Action Council in Columbia, South Carolina from 1988-1990; and worked with The AIDS Education Network and The South Carolina Christian Action Council’s AIDS Taskforce. His fight to eliminate AIDS transmission at South Carolina’s Interstate rest stops and at a notorious Charleston pornography bookstore became a feature story on Connie Chung’s “Face to Face” television program. In 1990, Exoo served as a delegate to The Presidential Advisory Commission on AIDS to the Medical Association of the People’s Republic of China in Beijing, Wuhan, and Guangzhou. In the early 1990s, he was as the chief organizer, director of development, and chaplain of the Burning Bush AIDS Hospice and Retreat Center at New Vrindaban, West Virginia.

Putting his intellectual, theological, and musicological skills together, he became America’s first and, to date, only “church connoisseur,” making unannounced visits to dozens of churches and synagogues in the greater Pittsburgh area. Dubbed “The Church Man,” he rated the congregations for the architecture of their buildings,, the content of their sermons, the quality of their music, their social outreach, and their hospitality to strangers. The insightful, often funny, and occasionally pointed reviews, aired on National Public Radio’s WQED-FM and brought him national and international attention. The reviews resulted in guest appearances on “Good Morning America,” and profiles in The Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the BBC, and numerous other networks.

Euthanasia activism
Always an animal lover, Exoo served as a member and vice president of the Charleston Spay Not Slay League from 1977 to 1992. In the 1980s, he led the fight in Charleston to end the barbaric practice used by local animal “shelters” of killing unwanted stray dogs and cats by throwing them into 55-gallon drums and then piping in hot automobile exhaust gases until they died. It was his first step in becoming a euthanasia (literal meaning: “good death”) activist. Soon thereafter, he became a life member of The Hemlock Society USA, formed in 1980 by Derek Humphry, an American euthanasia pioneer. In 2003, the group changed its name to The Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization (ERGO). It holds that “voluntary euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and self-deliverance are all appropriate life endings depending on the individual medical and ethical circumstances.”

One of Exoo’s first encounters with self-deliverance came in 1995, when he and the wife of a close friend comforted the woman’s husband as he took his own life. The man was in the final stages of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as “Lou Gehrig’s disease.” The disease kills the nerve cells that control the muscles, but the slow and certain death does not rob the victims of their mental facilities, making the progressive and irreversible losses tragically more horrifying every day. The man’s wife bought him the best-selling book by Derek Humphry titled Final Exit. It is a how-to book on killing yourself using medicines commonly found around the house or devices available legally at any big-box department store. With his wife and Exoo at his side, the man rapidly consumed a handful of crushed sedative pills mixed into applesauce, and washed the mixture down with a stiff Screwdriver (vodka and orange juice), knowing that alcohol would accelerate the effect of the sleeping pills. As short time later, he died.

The Compassionate Chaplaincy
In the following years, Exoo, often with the help of several other volunteers from like-minded euthanasia groups, gave advice, counsel, and a comforting spiritual presence to over one hundred people who wanted to die with dignity, but who were afraid to do so alone. Reverend Exoo and several other euthanasia activists founded The Compassionate Chaplaincy Foundation, now headquartered in Beckley, West Virginia. This 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization provides end-of-life counseling and terminal assistance to those whose lives have become insurmountably, unrelentingly, and endlessly painful and wish to end their lives at their own chosen time.

The Rosemary Toole Affair
Exoo’s work as a “final exit guide,” the name by which he and many of his colleagues world-wide have come to be known, has been deliberately kept low-profile. He assists his clients quietly and in private. The case that brought him into the international limelight was that of Rosemary Toole, a 48-year-old resident of Dublin, Ireland. Toole had many reasons to want to die. Medically, she was suffering from Cushing’s Syndrome (CS), caused by an overproduction of cortisal in the brain. Cortisol is a hormone produced principally in response to physical or psychological stress and is secreted by the adrenal glands. The symptoms of Cushing’s Syndrome usually include fatigue, weakness, depression, mood swings, increased thirst and urination, and lack of menstrual periods in women.

In addition, she had developed a deep depression due to several causes, including abandonment by both her parents as a very young child and by failure of her marriage. By the time she was referred to George Exoo by a member of the Canadian right-to-die network, she had already attempted to commit suicide once before. Indeed, she had spent the previous five years talking about little else, according to her father. She had spent hundreds of hours on the telephone and the Internet, talking to people about how to kill herself, and even the head of the conservative right-to-die organization in Scotland could not talk her out of it. One way or another, Rosemary Toole was committed to end her own life.

After convincing George Exoo and the expert he consulted that she was both of sound mind and absolutely committed to self-deliver, Exoo and his close friend, Thomas McGurrin, agreed to fly to Dublin to make a final assessment of her case, to assure that she had assembled the needed supplies, and to provide a compassionate presence as she made her transition to the Other Side. When they arrived in Dublin, they found that Toole had assembled enough supplies to kill several people. These included a large number of powerful prescription sleeping pills, which, when crushed into powder and mixed into a glass of vodka, would quickly render her unconscious. Her final act, as she felt the sleep overtaking her, would be to pull over her head a specially made plastic “exit bag,” which was connected to a tank of helium — the same tanks used to fill party balloons. Within just a few breaths, the tasteless and odorless gas would render her completely unconscious, and death would follow quickly and without pain.

On Friday night, January 25, 2002, Rosemary Toole took a shower, donned her favorite dress, and went to the bedroom of a Dublin apartment she had rented for her final exit. She had purchased four large helium tanks, each twice the size of those that normally come packaged in a helium party balloon kit. According to Exoo, she had enough helium for four people. Clearly, Toole did not want the lack of anything to jeopardize her death. Rosemary took a large gulp of the vodka and pills, leaving some in the glass to let the police, who would eventually find her, know that the suicide was deliberate.

As Exoo and McGurrin prayed with her, Rosemary started to slip into unconsciousness. Her final act was to turn on the flow of helium into the plastic bag and pull the bag over her head. Her breathing quickly slowed, and after a few minutes, it stopped. After waiting an additional half hour to ensure that she had indeed passed over, Exoo and McGurrin left.

When the Irish police found her body and suicide note the next day in the rented apartment, they went to her house and searched her home computer. There they found numerous emails between Toole and Exoo. The details were all leaked to the Irish and British tabloid press, who turned Rosemary’s suicide into a media frenzy. In Catholic Ireland, assisted suicide was a crime, and the stories that flew into print in the ensuing weeeks — filled with guesses and inaccurate, often deliberately misleading information, galvanized the Irish police to demand that Exoo and McGurrin be extradited back to Ireland to stand trial for murder. In 2002, formal requests were made to the U.S. State Department…and nothing happened. The Irish police grew despondent, believing that their request would not be considered. They even sent two detectives to the United States to attempt to interrogate Exoo and McGurrin, but as they had no jurisdiction here, and because the Americans denied any impropriety or wrongdoing and declined to comment, the Irishmen left empty-handed.

Exoo arrested
Without warning, on the morning of June 25, 2007, FBI agents appeared at Exoo’s door in Beckley, West Virginia, and arrested him. In handcuffs, he was taken to the Southern Regional Jail, near Beckley, where he was booked and jailed, pending a hearing at which it will be determined if there will be any legal grounds for him to be extradited to Ireland. Exoo denies that he took any active role in Toole’s suicide, stating that he broke no laws by observing it and providing a compassionate presence as she carried out her own last wishes. He will contest any attempts to extradite him. The date for his arraignment was not available at the time of this writing.

This page will be updated as further information becomes available.


Jun 28 2007

Interesting copy of articles

Tag: Diarymary @ 4:11 pm

Interesting copy of articles are posted under The Media elsewhere on this site…in particular to do with the Rally on Parliament Steps.  There is an article about Dr Rodney Syme (minus a very good photo of a smiling relaxed Vice President of DWDV. which was on page 3 of July’s The Senior Newspaper.   I liked that it talked as much about Rodney the man as a doctor, as Rodney the Doctor talking about voluntary euthanasia.   What he says makes sense and I do hope we don’t have to bail him out of jail because he talked about medication with a patient….The law can be pretty stupid on occasions like this.   I do hope Liberal Member Ken Smith starts his Private Members Bill about the same time as the Coroner starts looking into why “Steve Guest might have died more quickly than palliation alone would serve him”….

A full report on the day along with photos of the rally is at www.dwdv.org.au/SGD2007MediaKit2.html    A motley lot we look too, frozen and in a weaken state mostly but keen as mustard to hear our Guest Speakers words of wisdom and encouragement.   Mr Neil Francis did an excellent job of reining in the group as Master of Ceremonies…..


Jun 25 2007

Your Choice In Dying

Tag: Diarymary @ 6:44 am

Below are four letters reproduced which helps me to explain why my site is name Your Choice In Dying.   If nothing else the letters convey the split views of society in addressing voluntary euthanasia. Philip Nitschke worries a great many people who can’t understand his impatience with trying to have legislative change implemented.   The fact he is so media savvy with his views, yet with the knowledge he has as a doctor, he could in some people’s minds step out of the limelight, stop talking about Nembutal and just create the chemicals that would assist the dying to die more easily…..Five years ago we had the opportunity to create a bank of knowledgeable people who could have diluted the power base that was Philip’s to share.  To some extent that’s working, but inhibited severely.

Crossing swords with the Federal Government has come at a high price for a great many people who once had access now denied them because of publicity and the tightening of regulations.  But society needs people like Dr Philip Nitschke to shake the complacency of people that “the doctor will look after me, he won’t let me suffer”… Well -  Yes He Will Let You Suffer – because of the fear of litigation and the bracket creep of Religion into our every day life and Government’s policy making based on it.  

Previously throughout the years I have questioned the definition of the value of a life and how selectively “we” Christians choose to consider it, sighting the wars in the Middle East as an example.   Low and behold, Mr Tony Blair, one of the The Willing, is visiting the Pope no less, prior to his “conversion” to the Catholic Faith.   Pleassssseee!!    He’ll have to abide by the Commandments now! Or burn forever in Hell’s Fire!    Thou Shalt Not Kill!    Pity his conversion didn’t come in time to save hundred of thousands of lost lives, menwomen and children.    See, I am not a Catholic and yet I have never killed anyone, nor been responsible for a death! – perhaps being an Atheist is safer for potential victims of world wars who don’t seem to count as victims anymore.  The more the Christian Governments kill the Muslim Government’s People, the more Hate we’ll generate in this World in God’s Name……. The really important thing to remember is that those thousands all wanted to live, but they were killed against their wishes….They have been murdered (revenge, greed, gain)   by our Governments and yet those same sanctimonious Governments would deny a terminally or chronically ill the reprieve from pain, of death:  

In response to Jane Fischer of Palliative Care Victoria, who to me sounds mind numbingly stupid! I can only say, the voluntary euthanasia group is about two things “voluntary” and considering only the patient’s individual needs and wants at the time of their dying.   A dying person needs only to consider themselves, for themselves!  Family are outside their pain barrier- they are leaving behind everything which includes life itself.   If in the leaving of life, one can do it expediently and swiftly cutting off all the physical process of the dying itself, then for some of us that’s the way we like it!   Choice for the individual. (I also ate my artichokes first to get the unpleasantness out of the way, leaving the good stuff till last.  It shows my spirit to be the type, not to avoid but to confront and dispose of bad things first….I will not dally along the way.)

Has Jane Fischer never been to a party where there is always the guest who will slip away, having said a quiet farewell to the host? and then there’s the other type, who wants it known they’re leaving with much attention drawn to the fact that they are leaving the scene and they want everyone around them to know it.  

Neither method is wrong but it does explain why people require choice about how they exit their life!

When I am terminally ill “my physical, emotional, social, cultural and spiritual support”  will be irrelevant because my experience is terminal at that point in my life.   Perhaps the one important thing will be whether my family watch me laying inert for a week under an induced drugged coma, or watch me gasping for breath and struggling with pain out of control as disease rots my insides.  Jane Fischer cannot experience what the dying person is because each is different, but she has no right to assume that what  she understands may be appropriate for her wellbeing in dying,  is necessarily shared by others.  I for one, differ greatly from what she sees as important.  Her definition of “dignity” may have come from an entirely different dictionary to mine.  I want dignity, for me, on my terms.

I will make every effort to ensure I have final control over my life’s death experience firstly for my own sake, but also by default for my family,  knowing they’ve been spared an unnecessary experience in the process.

I’d rather take 10 minutes badly than 10 days, ,weeks ,months even more badly and for so much longer.

 

——————

Two letters taken off an international forum of like minded people who believe in the right to die well:

Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:38:41 -0800
The Mexican Affair – Dr Nitschke

Dr Nitschke’s going public by yelling from all the roof tops the Mexican possibility of obtaining the pentobarbital has worried me for some time.
I do wonder if he is driven more by the urge to retaliate because of the Government’s recent change to the media law as well as the axing of the Northern Territory Euthanasia option or by the wish to help suffering people to end their misery. I fear he is doing us a disservice.

Bess
Townsville Australia

Another wrote in response:

 which is tarring us all with the same brush. The publicity mostly > originates with Dr Nitschke, who seems to revel in the personal
attention it affords him. There are many many people in Australia who > support the RTD cause in various ways, but not all applaud the methods > employed by Philip Nitschke, in the same way that not all RTD  supporters in the US applaud the approach which was taken (in the > past) by Jack Kevorkian.

Sadly, we have as little chance of reining in the Nitschke media

 machine as you would have had in stopping Kevorkian in his heyday.  Early on, Philip Nitschke publicly declared Kevorkian was his hero.
Perhaps there’s a message in that.

Queensland,  Australia

———————

Two Letters published in The Age Newspaper June 22, 2007:

Care, Not ending Life

The opinion piece by Rodney Syme (The Age 20/6) confuses the issues of palliation, limiting it essentially to the provision of medical intervention to control pain and suffering.

Palliative care is specialist health care and practical support for people who are living with a terminal illness, their families and care givers.   It is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families, by the provision of physical, emotional, social, cultural and spiritual support.

Many of those who work in palliative care share common ground with those advocating voluntary euthanasia: in supporting a dignified death, having a deep compassion for suffering, and an active concern for quality of life.   But it needs to be clear palliative care does not include euthanasia and the deliberate ending of life.

                                                                                                                        June Fischer, Palliative Care Victoria

An Act of Love

Rodney Syme (The Age 20/6) is quite correct.   His actions were compassionate and motivated by a concern for Steve Guest’s suffering and not be vengeance, greed or personal gain. – motives we associate with murder.  

It was an act of love, and vastly improved his patient’s quality of life.  

Access to physician-assisted dying has shown to extend lives, with approximately 40 per cent of Oregon patients who receive the drugs choosing not to take them, but who feel relieved by having the drugs available.

By contrast, the current legal situation in Australia leads to patients committing suicide prematurely and in gruesome ways.

                                                                                                                        Winston Jen, Brighton


Jun 24 2007

Police to review doctor’s comments

Tag: Diarymary @ 11:45 am

Iolanda read her birthday wishes in my diary and sent me the following email in part:

Hey Mary …. thanks for the birthday wishes :-)

But how did you know it was my birthday? I must have told you sometime but not recently …. a lovely surprise to see a message like that ….
with lovely things written in it. Thanks :-)

But as for my support of VE …. sure, it’s because of pain…. but it’s mainly because of some other factors. Besides the pain i suffer chronic fatigue, chronic hunger and thirst, distorted senses (eg. distorted tastes, smells etc) constant urinary needs …. oops… forgot….. bad memory ;-) and a high risk of dementia and possible cancer recurrence.

I would HATE to be a dementia patient screaming out to be fed 24/7 because I was hungry and couldn’t remember that I’d eaten 1 hour ago … and literally hate everything I eat because of my sensory problems…..

This is one of the reasons for my support …. not just pain. Not just cancer recurrence. My other medical problems which may cause problems.

Anyway, I’m off to lay back ….

Thanks again for the birthday SURPRISE ….. it was really a surprise!! :-)

This is indeed the voice behind the pain!   I hope she doesn’t mind me sharing this information….because the politicians need to know of it from the sufferers themselves…First hand information in their words….

——————–

Article from the Geelong Advertiser, a paper which covered the VE Rally organized to commemorate Steve Guest, a local living in Point Lonsdale at the time of his death.  There is also another one from The Age included under Media. Police to review doctor’s comments

Mex Cooper

22Jun07

Dr Rodney Syme.
POLICE will review an investigation into Steve Guest’s death following a doctor’s admission he prescribed medication that may have helped him die.

Rodney Syme told a public rally on Wednesday that he gave medication to Mr Guest before the 58-year-old committed suicide in his Point Lonsdale home in July, 2005, after a painful battle with oesophageal cancer.

Dr Syme, vice-president of Dying With Dignity Victoria, told protesters he believed prescribing Mr Guest drugs had been a form of palliative care rather than a case of assisted suicide.

Detective Acting Senior Sergeant Stephen McIntyre said he was unaware until late yesterday that Dr Syme had made further comments about Mr Guest’s death.

He said police would follow up exactly what was said.

“We have to take on board what has been said and make decisions as to where it goes from there,” Det-Sen-Sgt McIntyre said.

Det-Sen-Sgt McIntyre is heading an investigation by the homicide squad into Mr Guest’s death at the request of the coroner.

Dr Syme was interviewed about 18 months ago as part of the investigation but told the Geelong Advertiser he had not told police about the prescription.

He refused to disclose the medication or dose involved.

Det-Sen-Sgt McIntyre said prior to Dr Syme’s comments this week, the investigation had been due to be completed and a brief of evidence handed to the coroner in the “next couple of months”.

He said police had not decided whether or not to lay charges and once the brief was completed it was up to the coroner to decide if an inquest was needed.

Assisted suicide carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment but Dr Syme said no doctor had been charged in Victoria in the past 40 years as police turned a blind eye to the consequences of “utterly opaque” legislation.

Dr Syme’s stance was supported by Labor MP for Mount Waverley and parliamentary secretary for health Maxine Morand, and Liberal MP for Bass Ken Smith.

Mr Smith wants to introduce a private members Bill in State Parliament to enable doctors to prescribe drugs to terminally ill people who want to die.


Jun 24 2007

she “gives me a run for my money”

Tag: Diarymary @ 7:00 am

Firstly I want to say “Happy Birthday” Iolanda, a very hard working member of the voluntary euthanasia fraternity who provides members with all sorts of valuable information, and without whom, I would not be able to be as prolific with what’s happening outside Victoria…..Iolanda herself keeps bad health but a good sense of humour!.  A very dedicated woman who enjoys other interests as well, keeping her off the streets and providing balance in a life that could always be engulfed in pain and despair.   All members try to live balanced lives between the really serious stuff of illness and the frivolous – but we never take our eye off the ball!

I was listening to Michael Palin on  Parkinson’s last night and he was talking about keeping a diary.   He likened it to be like a mistress, something that needs to be serviced, maintained, cared about….and one has to be careful not to allow the diary to become your life where you “do things” based on recording something great in the diary…..It felt strange to me to hear a diary described in this way as for me, it takes no effort to write up bits and pieces, with the same enthusiasm as I give to Kevorkian, Neil Francis, Rodney or Philip.

 I once went into an author’s website’s diary to discover it was a banal exercise of 5 lines telling me, she’d been shopping that day with her boyfriend to David Jones.   I’ve since learnt that technically what I call a Diary,  is in fact a Journal – but if telling people what I had for breakfast is an effective use of cyber space, I won’t qualify!

The other day I received an email from a lady in Sydney telling me that the documentary Do Not Resuscitate was going to be screened as part of a training day, to help health care workers better understand the motives behind voluntary euthanasia.   I thought afterwards what a great idea, because the documentary itself was so balanced….

With Judy she demonstrated faith in the health system hoping there’d be a cure for Multiple Sclerosis.   Her particular prognosis was very bad, already wheel chair reliant she spent much of her time crawling around on the floor to undertake many activities in her day.  You have to see it to believe it trust me, but she is determined to the extent she “gives me a run for my money”…She is even more stubborn and pigheaded than I am…Judy has explained it to me like this….She has lost so much control over the muscles of her body, she seeks to dominate with her mind, those she meets and greets these days…she does it mostly quite sweetly but one gets the message quickly there is little room for tolerance in not accommodating her needs.   Judy also explains that her understandably  emotional instability is due to her illness, and the extreme difficulty in verbal communication frustrates this retired teacher almost beyond her endurance…..Again the muscle co-ordination is deteriorating.    Judy no longer lives in hope of a “cure”…She has problems with her bowel and bladder….and life must seem pretty grim….and yet like many really sick people, her charm and humor shine through…. Judy is resigned at one level of her intelligence which is huge, to the outcome of her disease, but I believe she would be first in the queue, seeking a cure should a trial come up that has had some significant lab results.  I never met Judy until after the completion of the documentary filming.

I can’t talk too much about Steve Guest without the tears welling up.   That he had to go to the extraordinary lengths he did to achieve a peaceful death is an indictment on a society that calls itself humane!….That the flesh on his body could hang so pitifully, again with a sharp and witty mind is just cruel.   To watch a man dying on his feet and not feel compelled to make it a short induced permanent sleep is intolerable to think about.   Thanks to compassionate doctors he achieved the information he so desperately needed.   That the palliative care people cannot comprehend that not everyone wants to be drugged into unconsciousness which in itself is rather a stupid concept anyhow.   Death is not the enemy of anyone who is “ready to die” because living is just too painful.   I never met Steve in person and yet his face is forever etched in my mind.

Myself, I am the political activist who dropped the baton briefly, but I’ll come good……I’ve resigned from the Labor Party in May,  having taken off my rose colored glasses in thinking that Labor would be more socially aware than the Liberals.  How wrong I have proved to be!.  

Mr Ken Smith,  a Liberal is seriously considering bringing in a Private Member’s Bill into the Victorian Parliament.  I’d always thought the Greens would do it first but I think they would fully support it anyhow.  

Labor politicians worry me a little in that, unless they feel strongly at a personal level about VE, their careers may be jeopardized by disagreeing with “the Boss”, Premier and practicing Catholic in control of Victorian Government (bringing his religious views into the House) Steve Bracks!   

We are always talking about choice for the individual in whether terminally ill people may choose to die sooner rather than later.   STILL GOING TO DIE REGARDLESS due to an incurable illness, but whether to continue to suffering until death will not be denied is the point!.

Legislative change will work for those who are tied to a bed and can’t help themselves, but while the rest of us are ambient, there will always be choices,  in spite of the system being determined to force us to live beyond our use by date.   It should be about what the individual wants for themselves, about their life, and their death….Your life, your choice, my life, my choice!


Jun 22 2007

Liberal MP wants euthanasia law changed

Tag: Diarymary @ 1:32 pm

Carol Nader
June 21, 2007

Latest related coverage
Liberal MP wants euthanasia law changed

A STATE Liberal MP is proposing to move a private member’s bill that would allow doctors to provide medication at the request of terminally ill patients to help them die.

The proposal by veteran MP Ken Smith came as Bracks Government MP Maxine Morand, the parliamentary secretary for health, yesterday voiced support for voluntary euthanasia at a rally on the steps of Parliament House.

If Mr Smith’s bid to introduce the bill is successful, it is possible that the Victorian Parliament could have another emotive conscience vote.

Ms Morand’s personal view is at odds with the Government’s stance on euthanasia. Premier Steve Bracks has previously said that if there was a conscience vote on euthanasia, “I’m not predisposed to support it”. State Opposition Leader Ted Baillieu has indicated he is personally in favour of voluntary euthanasia.

Under the Medical Treatment Act, patients can legally refuse medical treatment. But Rodney Syme, vice-president of Dying with Dignity Victoria, says the law is “opaque” when it comes to doctors giving terminally ill patients medication to relieve their symptoms, knowing that it could also hasten their death.

Dr Syme has left himself open to prosecution for assisting suicide by admitting he gave terminally ill man Steve Guest medication that may have helped him die. Dr Syme says his intent was not to help Mr Guest die, but to relieve his suffering. Mr Guest had cancer of the oesophagus and took his own life about two years ago.

Dr Syme says he made the admission to highlight grey areas in the legislation.

Mr Smith yesterday talked to Ms Morand and Greens MLC Colleen Hartland about the possibility of co-sponsoring a private member’s bill. He said each would speak to their respective parties.

Such a bill would make it not an offence to confidentially advise a terminally ill person or to “assist or support” a death, Mr Smith said. “It’s got to be at the request of the patient,” he said.

“I feel very strongly about this. I’ve seen a lot of people die, a lot of people in agony, and a lot of people who shouldn’t have to put up with pain but they did. I just think that something like this would be a worthwhile contribution to my time in Parliament.”

Ms Morand, a former nurse, said she had discussed the possibility of a private member’s bill with Mr Smith, but wanted to discuss it with her party before proceeding.

“I am supportive of voluntary euthanasia and have been for a long time, but I’ve always taken a view that I’d like to work within the party,” she said.

“I’ve said to Ken that I would have some further discussions with my colleagues and get back to him.”
Mr Smith’s proposal has already earned the support of the Greens, with Ms Hartland saying she was keen to co-sponsor a private member’s bill.

“It would be that basic right of people to be able to access drugs that would assist them to die, and die at their choosing,” she said.
She said it was important for bills of this nature to be co-sponsored because they needed to cross party lines. When Federal Parliament had a conscience vote on allowing the abortion drug RU486 to be widely available in Australia, the bill was sponsored by four women from four different parties.

Tim Pigot, spokesman for Health Minister Bronwyn Pike, said the Government believed the Medical Treatment Act gave sufficient support for doctors and individuals when a patient was approaching the end of their life. The act allows a competent person to refuse medical treatment for a condition and to nominate someone as an agent to make medical decisions on their behalf, should they become unable to make such decisions for themselves.

———————-

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jun/07062108.html


Permanent Vegetative State (PVS) Diagnosis Often Inaccurate More Data Shows

By Hilary White

RHODES, June 21, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – News-Medical.net is reporting on a series of studies that show a high rate of misdiagnosis and inaccuracy in patients deemed to be in a “permanent vegetative state” (PVS). The researchers say that the problem is grounds for “extreme caution” in decisions that might “limit the life chances” of patients.

The pretext of a PVS diagnosis is commonly put forward by the euthanasia movement as a reason to allow euthanasia by dehydration, as in the case of Terri Schiavo.

Researchers at the University of Liège in Belgium examined data on over 5900 patients at the intensive care unit at the university hospital. The data showed that of 356 patients diagnosed on admission as being in a vegetative state, just over half left the hospital with some degree of restored consciousness. 59% had recovered enough to obey commands.

The Belgian study said that a quarter of such patients have a good chance of recovery of a “significant proportion of their faculties”.
Another showed that as many as 40% of PVS diagnosed patients were incorrectly diagnosed as having no cognitive function when in fact they had minimum consciousness.

Experts at the June 16 to 20 European Neurological Society Meeting in Rhodes said the findings showed that greater care had to be exercised with regard to end-of-life decisions. These findings match many other studies that show the PVS diagnosis is frequently inaccurate. As long ago as 1996, a study published in British Medical Journal showed that 43% of patients diagnosed with PVS do not qualify for the diagnosis.

Dr. Steven Laureys, the lead researcher in the Belgian study, said, “Our data shows that acute vegetative state is certainly not rare among patients admitted to intensive care.”

“What is important to note is that it may be transient and that the prognosis for patients with impaired consciousness depends to a great extent on the nature of the brain damage.”

The transitory nature of the PVS condition is attested by regular news features about patients that doctors had declared incurable ‘waking’ after significant time in a coma or reduced state of consciousness.

Legal expert and anti-euthanasia activist Wesley J. Smith writes that the research “should give great pause to those who advocate not
supplying or quickly removing life support for people with traumatic head injury.”

Smith suggested that it should also prevent doctors from dismissing the assertions of family members that a patient has some consciousness. In their fight to save their daughter’s life, the family of Terri Schindler-Schiavo were persistently told by doctors that they were only imagining their daughter’s reactions to stimuli.

Smith writes, “What really needs to be done is to reject the notion that people with severe brain injuries are somehow less ‘human’ or are not ‘persons.’ Unless and until we do that, people in these devastated states will not be safe.”

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:


Jun 21 2007

Pillow talk with our Mr Howard?

Tag: Diarymary @ 10:49 am

At 4 am this morning I woke up thinking about yesterday’s public gathering with kindred spirits on choice for methods in dying…and I remembered someone as saying “Piss off Pell” referring to said Cardinal’s interference with Australian Politicians in telling them how to vote on stem cell research.   And then in this morning’s news out of America we learn that President Bush has vetoed federal funding of stem cell research of contentious specifics, in his country.   Pillow talk with our Mr Howard? on more than one subject at a time too!Last night I also remembered we had media man Terry Lane address the group, and in addition, a message from Phillip Adams,   Very importantly the message given out is that “this is our life, to do with it what we want – you may feel and do differently – but for myself I want choice about my decision making for end of life”….

One of the politicians mentioned also that she was a Catholic, who if pushed to consider Choice and Dignity in Dying and be threatened with excommunication (kicked out of the church) as a result of her decision, she would choose “choice”…..Like one of the other politicians, who professed to being a Christian, said also, that he believed his God to be a much more compassionate one that would not want to have his people suffer.   He would base his activity relating to any legislation on the belief that God is merciful.

Being up exceptional early (as I frequently am) I heard the American morning breakfast show and it flashed across the screen a few times that American studies of thousands of women now believe that the gene implicating breast cancer can not only be transmitted from the mother, but the father’s side of the family as well.  

The bottom line is,  that if breast cancer was prevalent on either side of the family, you as a woman are at greater risk of developing breast cancer, so worth noting I thought!….

———————-

*Media Release: 20 Jun 07

For Immediate Release*
*Hundreds Attend Dying With Dignity Rally*

Dr Rodney Syme, Vice President of DWDV, addresses the rally.

These and other hi-res photos are available at  http://www.dwdv.org.au/SGD2007MediaKit2.html

A rally on the steps of Parliament House today [Wed20June] drew hundreds of supporters demanding law form for *dying with dignity* in Victoria.
The rally commemorated the second anniversary of the death of Steve Guest <http://www.dwdv.org.au/RealStories.html#SteveGuest>, a journalist and former media advisor to the Cain Labor Government.

Steve Guest ended his own life two years ago after courageously sharing his intense suffering — from inoperable cancer of the oesophagus — with listeners on the ABC 774 Jon Faine radio programme. On air, he railed against those who would deny him the right to die his way and condemned those who preferred to see him die an agonisingly slow and painful death.

Speaking at the rally, Dr Rodney Syme, Vice President of Dying With Dignity Victoria (DWDV) said that he had provided Guest with medication and challenged the Victorian Parliament to get on with enacting legisation to enable doctors to respond to the requests of people like Guest.

“People, if they are terminally or incurably ill and suffering profoundly, should have the right to request medical assistance to help
them end their own lives peacefully, if that is their choice,” he said.

———————–

http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/an-easier-end-to-awful-suffering/2007/06/19/1182019112460.html?

An easier end to awful suffering

Rodney Syme
June 20, 2007

DO DOCTORS kill patients? They certainly do. I am not referring to patients who die accidentally, or negligently, due to wrong diagnosis, the wrong drug or wrong dosage, or a failed operation. I refer to deliberate killing, although it would be more appropriate to write of deliberate hastening of death, as it occurs in relation to dying patients — either those dying predictably with a terminal illness, or those dying more slowly with a chronic incurable illness.

How can this be if deliberate killing is illegal, even if death is hastened only by a few minutes?

Doctors, of course, have a different relationship with the cause of death than the general public. They have a duty to dying patients to respect their autonomy, and a responsibility to provide maximum relief of pain and suffering, as enshrined in the preamble to the Victorian Medical Treatment Act. Their ministrations in providing this palliation must, on occasions, mean providing treatment that will foreseeably hasten death, or can be seen to be likely to hasten death.

If a lay person carries out an action that causes death, and that person could foresee that it could cause death, then he or she is likely to be guilty of manslaughter, at least. A doctor, however, is not, provided he can argue that it was his intention to palliate, not cause death.

Sounds simple but it is not, because this circumstance is not based on statute law; rather, it relies on legal precedent. It works to some extent in practice because the doctor’s intention is hard to determine, and there is usually a clear necessity for the relief of suffering, although Australian law does not recognise this argument of necessity.

For many years, doctors have been able to provide large and increasing doses of morphine to terminally ill patients to relieve their pain, perhaps having discussed the consequence that such treatment will hasten death. The patient may actually request such treatment, their intention being to relieve their intolerable suffering by hastening their death.
The intention of the doctor is to palliate, even if he empathises with the patient’s wish to die.

Over the past 20 years, doctors have expanded their practice to provide terminal sedation to dying patients for whom pain may not be the principal suffering. It has been provided for extreme breathing difficulties, delirium, exhaustion, and extreme psychological and existential distress. Such patients are put to sleep by sedatives and kept asleep without nutrition and hydration, an inevitably fatal process, until they die. They do not suffer, but their dying may be prolonged. Much the same process can be provided to patients who refuse treatment and as a result will die, or from whom treatment, such as ventilators, dialysis and artificial hydration, is withdrawn.

Erich Loewy, professor of bioethics at the University of California, says of this process: “Terminal sedation, we would claim, differs from some form of voluntary euthanasia mainly in that it has not been and is unlikely to be legally challenged.”

Because such actions are not covered by statute law, but merely by precedent, many doctors feel insecure in providing maximal relief of pain and suffering. As a result, the hastening of death in this context is an extremely arbitrary process, and depends on the place of treatment (hospital or home), the disease (terminal or chronic), and the attitude of the doctor (courageous and humanist, or cautious and religious). The knowledge and position of the individual making a request can be important.

As legal philosopher Professor Ronald Dworkin has said: “The current two-tier system — a chosen death and an end to pain outside the law for those with connections, and strong refusals for other people — is one of the greatest scandals of contemporary practice.”

Former Supreme Court of Victoria judge Richard McGarvie said: “As the law stands, only the good sense of prosecuting authorities and juries stands between compassionate doctors and convictions for murder.”

In July 2005, Steve Guest contacted me. He was dying from oesophageal cancer. He could not swallow and was being fed through a stomach tube.
He had lost 35 kilograms in nine months, and he was exhausted. His pain was barely controlled by morphine, the effect of which he described as “a shot of lead in the brain”. His greatest suffering, however, was his psychological and existential distress — he had no control over his dying. After a prolonged consultation, I offered him terminal sedation for his distress, but he would have none of it. In my opinion, giving him control would be of the utmost palliative value, and it was the only palliation that would be effective. In response to his request, I gave him information about barbiturates, of dose and their effects. I gave him medication — not to have done so would have been totally ineffective, and amounted to abandonment.

As expected, having control profoundly affected the quality of his remaining life, and probably helped to prolong his life. He found purpose in the remainder of his life as an advocate for dying with dignity. Two weeks after I met him, utterly spent, he ended his life with security and dignity, his brothers with him in his own home.

My question is: should palliation only be by means of a needle, or could it not be equally, or even more efficient, by means of a prescription?
It certainly shows more respect for the patient’s autonomy. The doctor controls the needle, but the patient has control of the prescription. If it is lawful for me to tell my patient I will sedate him to unconsciousness when his suffering becomes intolerable, foreseeing hastening his death, would it not also be lawful to provide him with advice and medication that he would control to use in the same way with the same consequences?

The AMA would presumably agree — in 2002 it stated “that the AMA supports doctors whose primary intent is to relieve the suffering and distress of terminally ill patients, in accordance with the patient’s wishes and interests, even though a foreseen secondary consequence is the hastening of death”. I am sure I was doing just that for Steve Guest.

Dr Rodney Syme is the vice-president of Dying With Dignity Victoria.


Jun 20 2007

Commemorating Steve Guest’s Day

Tag: Diarymary @ 5:00 pm

My report on the Parliamentary Rally this afternoon 1 till 2,  commemorating  Steve Guest’s Day:

It’s all over bar the introduction into the Victorian Parliament, impending legislation for choice and dignity in dying.   Judy stood out in the crowd as being the only wheelchair bound person present, although there were two ride on motor “supporters” as well.   She told me she would have come rain, hail or sunshine…..for the whole two hours I had her in the city we had barely a speck of rain….Judy looked quite cute in her black hat and bright red scarf and I know she felt proud to be there representing the cause!…

Steve Guest’s brother John, spoke and of course I was in tears all over again,  listening to Steve’s voice.   John said of Steve,  that his biggest relief was knowing that practical help and advice was available…Dr. Rodney Syme drove down the coast immediately on hearing Steve’s call for help.  Steve Guest is one of those people I wished I had met in life.

The lady standing next to me had her husband of 50 something die of the same esophagus cancer so it was very sad for her also. 

June Reeder’s letter was read out to the crowd on behalf of all those who couldn’t attend the rally, and I’ve asked her to provide me with a copy under “Your Say”.   Manfred kept the group in check as a marshall,  as we needed herding as we spilled out over the steps and footpath….I really felt too emotional to participate in my marshalling duties as the speakers were addressing us.

Guest Speakers including a Liberal, Labor and a Greens politicians and to a person recalled how they’d seen loved ones die badly and wanted it to be better for the future generations….There was optimism that the current Parliament would see a Private Members Bill introduced and it was told to us that the majority of Victorian Politicians did actually support the Dying with Dignity Charter.

Mr Smith said he didn’t “like”  what Exit International were proposing (with the peaceful pill), but he totally supported the political solution put forward by DWDV.   To a journalist later, I just said, I support both concepts fully,  because it has to be about choice for the individual and decisions would depend on how long a person wished to continue with their treatment.

I thought Neil Francis spoke very well as did Rodney.   One of the highlights of the day was being able to transport Judy to be there in person.   Music was great too!   Before I went,  and as I returned,  I felt she was pivotal to our cause because her need is so very obvious.   Personally I just don’t know how she manages with everyday issues.   I made her even more content with her day by diverting just a little and taking her to see one of her old “homes” she lived in as a young woman in Windsor….She was possessively looking to see what changes had been made, pleased the lead light door was still there but quick to notice a skylight was an additional dressing.  Still painted white, I’m sure she would have loved to have got out of the car and walked up to the front door…but alas it was a few stairs again which is like Mt Everest…Her very stubbornness is what makes her tick!….Quite emotionally strained at times,  but realistic about her prognosis, her humor rarely leaves her for long.

Judy is 59 years old and as suffered Multiple Sclerosis since she was about 8 or 9.   She went on to train as a Literature Teacher and has traveled the world.    Judy tries very hard not to let her illness overwhelm her life.   Her friend, Heather who met her in there today was a welcomed sight for Judy, and there was much laughter  when it was remarked that Judy had been filmed quite a bit and would be even more famous…..

Admittedly I was very relieved that I was able to access a park for the handicapped behind Parliament for the duration as pushing a wheelchair up hill and down dale, is not all that easy with a large (seconded) placard which figured prominently in front of Judy most of the day…..My own placard had to stay in the car because I couldn’t handle any more things even with two hands….Thankful that the rain held off for all -  it was a great reminder of Steve Guest who never needs a reason to be remembered truthfully…And I saw many familiar happy faces in the crowd of perhaps 150…I’m sure someone did a count of mostly very grey heads! and even a dog or two!.

Mr Laurie Levy of the anti duck shooting fame was there with his video, as were the Geelong Journal and the Online Age with cameras.  Others had cameras but I wasn’t sure who they were.    Hopefully Neil’s assault on the political strongholds, and Rodney’s appeal to change doctor’s ability to do their job effectively without fear of legal ramifications, will work!….

No doctor has been charged in forty years of Victoria’s Parliament, but the threat is always there…..

It would seem the Young Liberals and Young Labor cut their Parliamentary teeth on voluntary euthanasia legislation last year in Victoria, and the Bill was passed.   Unfortunately, it was “make believe” to give them experience…..I called out like the yob I can be, and said “Bring On the Young – They’ll legislate Quicker!”

Thank you for those who braved the cold winds and represented all the others who couldn’t make it due to ill health and disabilities.

In particular thank you for the Nursing Staff represented with their flags in support of us.   Thank you one and all.

I believe we, presented both those in body and those in mind, (even NSW & Queensland) representing our cause extremely well….


Jun 20 2007

Judy is what the message is all about

Tag: Diarymary @ 10:33 am

I’m all rugged like a polar bear ready to pick up Judy Bayliss, who still insists on attending our Parliamentary Rally today at one o’clock in spite of the inclement weather……I’m just a little concerned about my ability at 65 to cope with Judy’s disability, placards, overheating and of course the rain and being responsible for someone in a wheelchair…..it’s all parcel of extending ourselves outside the comfort zone….I’ve organised to have one of the two disabled car parks at the back of Parliament House so I hope Bill doesn’t leave for lunch at 12.30 before I arrive with Judy….Not sure whether to drive around with her to the carpark and push her back to the meeting spot or try and drop her off first on the steps….I hope I don’t get “moved along”…

Judy is what the message is all about….her struggle and people like her who hope and want choice for a quick and painless death.  

I watched the documentary yesterday about a man’s struggle with Le Gehrig Disease and I marveled at his capacity to cope.  He said his choices may be different if he never had a very small child, and at about 33 he was hoping his wife could provide him with a second inspiration.  Apparently his disease is hereditary in about 10% of cases but in his, it was not!…  For myself I wouldn’t be taking the chance of passing my genes that could develop the disease, even if only 10%, to any offspring.   As the wife said, it was their choice to make and she was happy to have his children….Of course, the children will grow up without their father and a wife who has totally dedicated her life to her husband…..but what of the children’s lives and prospects….As you can tell, I’m no pioneering hero when it comes to creating waves with mother nature.

Well I’m off folks to pick up Judy,,,,with four layers of warm clothing and my Dying with Dignity Victoria T Shirt over the top of everything else……I’m amazed I could get it on…..but Rodney will be very pleased to see me in their standard, rather than my own…For the day, I have become part of their “team spirit” rather than running my own ship……(although we very much sail in the same fleet)

I’ll make sure Exit International’s voice is heard also!


Jun 18 2007

Euthanasia advocates to flout law

Tag: Diarymary @ 4:09 pm

This morning, Jon Faine, of Melbourne’s 774 was speaking about choice and dignity in dying and spoke of the rally being held at 1 pm on Wednesday June 20th (To be held on the steps of Parliament House, but of course, Jon quite correctly didn’t advertise it)…..He spoke of his memories of talking with Steve Guest and how powerfully Steve’s words impacted on him, as one human being to another, prior to his death.   Jon’s guest’s mother had recently died at the age of 96 years old….The doctors had the life support system rearing to go….Fortunately he discovered his mother’s living will directing him and his brother to allow her to die without medical intervention.

This lady was an educated soul, writing in three languages, speaking two….She was paralysed and was unable to speak but by grunting noises was able to confirm that her wishes of five years ago, still stood very firmly in her mind.   She was ready to die!  Right up until the sons produced the paperwork the doctors were prepared to intervene with nature’s course and fit her up with tubes – even at 96 with no chance of recovery the doctors would still have taken all medical action to sustain life!!!   once the living will was produced, even though it had no LEGAL status, it was morally acknowledged as her right to make the final decision!….Even so, it took 9 days further for his mother to die without the medical assistance of a doctor…..

Recently the old lady’s aged dog had to be euthanased at the home by their local vet….and as she observes its easy passing, she asked the vet for “some of what he’s having”….the vet laughed it off and said “sorry, sorry”…..Animals don’t have it so good when they’re thrown into the laundry outside in the cold at night all their lives dependent on us to feed, water, nurture and shelter them, but at the end of their life, mostly all dogs have that one advantage over us.   A good death!   I’ve been told the vets wholesale costs for a dog would be about 50c to $1 for Nembutal…..(recently I paid $60 for my dog Jack)   As we can’t take our worldly wealth with us, I can imagine that many elderly folk will be spending the children’s inheritance to ensure they go out easy – regardless of the costs, the risks, working on the principle at 70, 80 whatever! what can the Government do to them anymore that life itself hasn’t dished out to them – A war or three!

A week or so ago, I heard the statement that life is outliving our bodies capacity to cope with it.

Too me, nine days would be too long for my loving mother to lie comatose (actually mine’s was 14 days)….If anyone can give me a good reason why the delay in allowing both the dying to be free of restraint of “living” and the agonising waiting of watching a mother die slowly….just a shell of everything that was vibrant, energised and memorable about her….Not for me Children – please!!!!

The market for Nembutal will exist because it gives people a quick and easy death and the relatives a slow sense of relief that the end was quick and painless….not drawn out and pointless!

——————

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21923456-1702,00.html


Euthanasia advocates to flout law

* June 18, 2007

EUTHANASIA advocates have announced they will flout laws in Australia and New Zealand by illegally importing “the premier euthanasia drug” Nembutal.

The catch-us-if-you-can challenge to authorities was announced today by Exit International director Dr Philip Nitschke.

He said about 15 people from Australia and five from New Zealand will “tour” Mexico to obtain the drug.

“It is unfortunate that laws force elderly Australians and New Zealanders to become amateur drug runners just so they can establish control over their end of life options,” he said.

Versions of Nembutal are legally available to veterinarians in Australia and New Zealand to euthanise animals.

Human euthanasia however is not available in Australia and New Zealand, and harsh penalties exist for people convicted in these countries of assisting suicide.

“People are all too well aware that they leave it too late, so that they can’t make such a trip and then have to ask someone else to help them die, placing that person into an impossible legal position,” Dr Nitschke said.

Dr Nitschke said this is the third such Exit International drug trip, and places for it filled quickly.

More than 120 Exit members have already successfully returned with the drug from Mexico, he said.

Mexican regulations controlling the sale of Nembutal are lax.

The drug tourists will be given detailed instructions on where in Tijuana they can purchase a 100ml bottle of the drug for about $US30 ($36).

“More than 20 people will make the trip to Mexico in October to acquire the premier euthanasia drug Nembutal,” Exit International said.

Exit International’s euthanasia how-to book, the Peaceful Pill Handbook, is banned in Australia and New Zealand.

Dr Nitschke said the book is among the world’s best selling books, ranking among the top 15,000 books out of 10 million titles on the retail website Amazon.com


Next Page »