May 29 2007

Die with dignity – advocate

Tag: Diarymary @ 1:50 pm

(Geelong is a large provincial city in Victoria and nearest major town to where Steve Guest lived and died, a man who went on the public record in an SBS TV Documentary – Do Not Resuscitate, 2006 to highlight the plight of grievously terminal cancer suffering)

Die with dignity – advocate

Simon Gladman
29 May 07  published in the Geelong Advertiser

Ros Botten is pro-euthanasia, but against the `death pill’.

THERE’S no dignity in taking a “death pill” to end your life, a Geelong euthanasia advocate believes.

Ros Botten, of Dying with Dignity, is against Exit Australia’s plan to manufacture the banned drug Nembutal to help people suicide.

“I personally don’t agree and Dying with Dignity doesn’t agree with the death pill. That’s not dignified,” she said.
“It would give me peace to be able to say to my doctor that when the time comes, `please don’t let me suffer’.

“Dying with Dignity has a charter that we want made into law so people wouldn’t have to go to all that trouble to make the drug. The charter has checks and balances so you just can’t kill someone. That’s what we’re fighting for.”

Mrs Botten is trying to attract new members to Dying with Dignity, formerly the Voluntary Euthanasia Society of Victoria.

The group will hold a workshop and information session at Geelong West Town Hall on Tuesday, June 12, from 9.30am to 1.30pm.

Footnote: I wish Ros well in her beliefs that she only has to ask and her doctor will deliver “dignity on request”.   I don’t think she really understands that the majority of doctors will not heed her request in the literal sense.   They will “tut tut” and reassure her of their good intentions but they most likely will not do anything practical to assist her request.   My friend took three weeks of unnecessary suffering because she trusted her doctor’s promise while she waited in vain for a cure for ovarian cancer.

Exit is not working towards the manufacture of the peaceful pill because they’ve nothing better to do with their time.  It is precisely because 60% of doctors will not help a patient die (including my own) and politicians just don’t have the guts to put the legislation to the test in parliament (80%,70%,60% want it to be legalised under restrictions but it is not happening!!!!

If Exit achieves even a semblance of a “peaceful pill” there will be many happy, in fact, very happy ill and chronically ill people throughout Australia with the security of knowing they don’t have to suffer beyond their level of endurance.

The peaceful pill concept is an idea….and we need our dreams of security safe in the knowledge we don’t have to suffer just because someone else has decided on our behalf that we can do so!

To remind Ros of last week’s news

“Dr Capolingua, described as feisty, was appointed AMA national president in Melbourne yesterday despite controversy over her comments on ABC TV’s Four Corners earlier this month that elderly people preparing to take their own lives must be relieved of the “belief that they need to have the right to choose death over continuing to live”.

In a widely circulated email, former NSW AMA president Dr Peter Arnold said AMA policy was to “encourage doctors to respect the patient’s autonomy” and Dr Capolingua’s comments “clash with this (AMA) clearly worded policy”. “


May 29 2007

Letter: We Deserve Choice to end life with Dignity

Tag: Diarymary @ 11:00 am

Letter published in “Your Say” The Senior June Edition

We Deserve Choice to end life with Dignity:

Apart from the sympathy I felt for Cheryl Field’s late father (My view, May) I enjoyed reading her story “No pollies at my bedside.”

I fully agree with her that anyone’s life belongs to themselves to do as they please when it comes to the time that there is no hope of recovering from terminal diseases or when the quality of life is such as not being worth living.

A person should have the choice to end it with dignity.

Voluntary Euthanasia should be available on demand by the person concerned.

I am not devoted to any mythological gods.  None of them gave me life.  My parents are gone – now my life belongs to me and no one else.  

Any politician in favour of introducing voluntary euthanasia will get my vote.

Keep persisting on this important issue.

G Brusasco, Kings Park

———————-

The Search for the ‘Peaceful Pill: Myth and Reality

An article written by Derek Humphry:   for World Right to Die Newsletter Summer 2007

For many years there has been an urban myth that there exists a tiny pill which, when swallowed, brings instant, painless death, thus wonderfully relieving the sufferer from further agony.

I have had requests for it scores of times from folk who genuinely believed such a fatal capsule was freely available. For instance, one note which reached me back in my Hemlock Society days read, quite simply: “Dear Hemlock, please send me one of your little red pills for me, and one for my friend Mary. I enclose $2.”

It has been called the ‘Drion Pill1 (after a Dutch judge of that name who pushed the idea in the 1990s), the ‘LastWillPill” and – much more popularly recently — the ‘Peaceful Pill’.

But this magic tablet does not exist, unless you exclude a cyanide capsule which only government secret services are able to obtain. (Even then it is an exceedingly painful — though fast — death that you would not want family to observe.) Puffer fish and some Australian snails are equally lethal, in seconds, but they do not of course come in pill form.

Over the years I have discussed the peaceful pill in my books, Final Exit (pages 110 and 139) and The Good Euthanasia Guide (page 21).
As such, a lethal pill does not yet exist, thus the term has developed into meaning any form of painless, quick, dignified death which the patient wishes to have.

It is a metaphor, not an object.

The most deadly substance on (he market is pentobarbital (often called Nembutal commercially) that is a barbiturate and powerful sleep-aid. It is usually the substance used in medical euthanasia where that action is legal. Worldwide, it is always on prescription, which few doctors will write because its connection with suicide is notorious. Even with pentobarbital’s high toxicity, it is still necessary to take in nine grams of it to ensure certain death – hardly pill popping.

The term has come back into attention with the publication of Nitschke/Stew art new book, The Peaceful Pill Handbook. They are careful to point out that this is a handbook outlining numerous methods of ending one’s life, not a single way out.

Thus the hunt for the deadly elixir or pill continues. Many Dutch doctors have searched for this (unholy) grail, and I am told they’ve given up. Fast acting barbiturates are settled as the euthanasia drug of choice, best injected but also lethal when drunk from a glass.

Currently, the favored means of exit in America is the careful inhalation of helium gas. which both Nitschke’s and my books outline with illustrations. A peaceful gas, not a pill. The beauty of this exit method is personal control and no doctors involved.

But what we really need is legal, medical, voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide in all countries interested in it. so that there is no need for these improvised, exotic pills and gases.


(The books mentioned above are obtainable from Amazon.com. Derek Humphy’s BLOG: http://www.assistedsuicide.org/blog/)

Footnote:

I loved the $2 in the envelope for the pill indicating the age of the person requesting the service.   Obviously the days of inflation haven’t yet hit her phone bill……I am sure the American Army has discovered an undetectable and instant killing “pill” because if it is to do with war they’ll “discover it”…..Bombs that can target warm bodies has got to have a follow up brother somewhere!   But will they release its use for peaceful purposes or just for killing innocent civilians.  Perhaps Israel with their stash of germ warfare could help us out?  Hidden away from prying eyes who knows what has been developed by “friendly nations”….

For those interested in the Middle East’s POV on euthanasia go into Additional/Related Readings?VEArticles and read an interesting journey there.


May 28 2007

At what cost is “being right” worth?

Tag: Diarymary @ 11:00 am

I am a little subdued these days because I’m feeling pressured by my own thoughts….I’m thinking about the funeral today for the young man who took his own life last Sunday.   I’m aware that his separated parents have been brought together in this horrendous circumstance of burying a child….A child who twenty one years ago brought such joy and happiness into their lives and yet all these years later there was only the grief and anguish to share.  

I begin to feel like some moralistic conservative but for the life of me I can’t understand why relationships need to turn so very ugly when people fall out of love with each other.   Why can’t adults hold their anger and need for revenge in check to the extent that it doesn’t pass on to the children….the poison of despair at a time when their lives should be full of the possibilities that life offers.

Why should children be subjected to their parents “spitting the dummy”?….They’re supposed to be the adult setting example to the children…..

Just this weekend I’ve learnt that a couple splitting up forced the sale of the family home.  The husband bought his own home back at Auction, because his wife had insisted on a settlement.   He’s now got a five bedroom home with three bedrooms to rock around in and his daughter mentioned she wasn’t sure where she’d be sleeping that night…….It doesn’t matter the reason….it is about how to settle disputes in a rational manner….I can imagine the most gleeful people would be the Real Estate Agent and the couple’s lawyers!!!    Certainly there must be an irony in being forced to go up a further fifty thousand dollars just to achieve “got you you bastard” outcome…..

Relationship breakdowns lead to severe depression and is it any wonder?   Surely no one can gain pleasure out of causing angst to someone you’ve once loved.   Cutting on one’s nose to spite the face!    Secretly within ones own spirit I feel there is always room for a tenderness towards someone once loved even when that love has ceased to smolder.   When parents disown children, children their parents, parents each other….someone will inevitably be hurt by the loss of communication that could have made it possible to reconnect.   It needs to be done sooner than later so that the connective tissues have a chance to heal themselves….

I once attended a Forum where a woman hadn’t spoken to her sister for two years because she’d criticized her haircut.  It wouldn’t have really been the haircut but only the catalyst for something much deeper.  It is so important to communicate hurt and anger as it happens so that it doesn’t become something that is no longer repairable.

My mother’s remarriage took me into a step father relationship where the parent fought bitterly over their respective children but we the children loved each others as siblings…Of course that divorce meant we children lost contact forever with each other.

but enough of this doom and gloom –

And then I remember my newest littlest one and I feel warm just thinking that I know his parents will never come to that because they already work on their differences with mutual respect……they won’t let their differences create the anger that results in the finality leading to the divorce or even death.  

At what cost is “being right” worth?……….The “if onlys” wouldn’t need to be said if only tolerance for difference became the norm!   Less selfish “me” and more Ok I hear “you”, would have gone a long way.


May 24 2007

My resignation is effective 10 pm, May 21st, 2007.

Tag: Diarymary @ 3:00 pm

LETTER OF RESIGNATION TO THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY: Member No 50895

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

It is with regret, but also a sense of relief I tender this letter of resignation. It is a painful decision arrived at over many months of consideration, but one which I feel is necessary for the sake of my own sense of integrity.

Since November 11, 1975 I have supported the ALP both in practical terms and with my commitment to positive membership.
I have fought the good fight around many dinner tables. I started with “Joan Child Board” in my front garden, I’ve worn my ALP T Shirt with pride, attending rallies, fundraisers and even rubbed shoulders with Mr Bracks at one of them……I’ve been involved!…I have walked many miles doing ALP letter drops and I’ve handed out thousands of how to vote cards, attended State Conferences as a visitor. I’ve written suggestions and observations throughout many years into the vacuum of the bureaucratic system that asks for our input, rarely receiving feedback.

But over the past months I’ve lost that sense of belonging. I can’t see its purpose any more. There is little point in being a member of a group in which so consistently ignores its members

I “worked” for the ALP as an Organization but it doesn’t “work” for me. Any healthy relationship has to be two-way if both participants are to prosper.

In fairness I have to say the Glen Huntly Branch to which I’ve belonged have been very good to me and very patient with my obvious passion for my particular interests. They’ve shared my frustrations with good grace, but they too appear to be ignored by the Party. I found myself asking “why do we put up with it?” and importantly “why do I put up with it”? and I decided I don’t need to.

My disillusionment started at the local level with Ann Barker, Member for Oakleigh, progressed as my communications to various sitting Members were consistently ignored and has culminated with the ALP Leader Kevin Rudd’s policies.

It started when I went into Ann’s office to complain about the police brutality which I experienced firsthand at the S11 anti-globalization rally on September 12, 2000. Horses were reared up a metre above me, causing a group of older folk to fall over and hurt themselves, one received a broken finger, trying to escape the hooves. Ms Barker asked rather disdainfully “Who are you?!” and her Office Manager had to tell her gently that I was a member given to doing many letter drops for her in Glen Huntly.

Recently, I rang prior to going on SBS Insight, to ask if she had any response to the concerns I’d raised with her and the 33 member Executive Committee of the ALP, (Bill Shorten & Stephen Newnham etc, etc) regarding proper procedures at the State Conference. Ms Barker told me it was the responsibility of the individual member to follow up perceived irregularities in its management.

Again, in recent times, at a local level I’ve made contact with Ms Barker on three separate issues, as a member of the ALP with deep concerns about due process, as an Advocate for Choice and Dignity in Dying, and as a member of the Glen Huntly Progress Group.

Ms Barker has consistently demonstrated a complete lack of interest in my concerns as a private citizen, as a member of the ALP and as an office bearer of the Glen Huntly Progress Group. Ms Barker, on being asked specifically, admitted that she had never attempted to take the issues raised with her outside her office. Ann lost votes in Glen Huntly at the last election for a very good reason – little representation!

One of the reasons for having elected members of the Parliament is so that the citizen’s concerns may be brought to the attention of either the Parliament or its bureaucracy. The ALP and Ms Barker have not fulfilled this function in my experience.

I cannot support a Party that will take uranium out of the ground to be sent back to Australia as nuclear waste in the short term and as missiles in some distance future. As a private citizen and a grandmother I have to think beyond the next election. I would rather my grandchildren had a peaceful co existence with the rest of the world than be wealthy because of uranium sales to countries who have shown themselves to be political unstable or warmongers such as our ally, the US. There is no joy in being the richest corpse in the cemetery.

I also strongly resent Kevin Rudd echoing the Howard Government’s cry to have Christian values underpinning Government policy making. Look at the Middle East, where religion and politics go hand in hand. Both State and Federal Governments should remain secular to ensure fair governance for all Australians.

A voluntary euthanasia policy implemented with strict guidelines ensures choice for the individual, but the current group of politicians, both Labor and Liberal favour Christian values above purely right/wrong, human/inhuman, kind/cruel, wise/stupid, good/bad. Do politicians consider the feelings of Australians who profess a different but no less valued faith.

As a member of the ALP, I was dismayed by the treatment of Mark Latham during his illness prior to his departure from politics when he ceased to be ‘useful’….No wonder he wrote such a scathing book in retaliation. I went into Simon Crean’s Office in Clayton to request the Labor Party stop their harassing of a very sick man while he was down. If we treat our own like that, what hope is there for others?

The strength of democracy relies to a great extent on the free flow of information and debate but neither the Liberal nor the Labor Party allows this to happen. The Labor Members signed away my right to free speech when they supported the Suicide Related Materials Bill January 2006 under the guidance of Mr Beazley.

The counter terrorist laws which were a knee-jerk reaction to an event on the other side of the world put Australia in the gun-sights of Islamic terrorists and this with the help of Labor. If Labor is ever to reinvent itself it needs to remember its roots and remove the words “me too!” from its dealings with the Liberal Party.

I’ve been asked many times who I think may win the next Federal election. I say quite honestly “I don’t know”. Many people are concerned by State Labor governments working with a Federal Labor government. Since personal experience has proven to me that neither the ALP Administrative Body, nor ALP Members will bother to listen to them once elected I can’t reassure them that Labor will honor its obligations.

The Labor Party as a bureaucracy has moved to the middle of the bed with the Liberals and they make a scary couple!

However I do take this opportunity to thank those members of the Glen Huntly ALP for all the support and friendships I’ve made over the years. I haven’t their strength of endurance.

My resignation is effective 10 pm, May 21st, 2007.

Mary Walsh

Footnote of explanation on the timing of the resignation was the ALP Branch Meetings were held in my home on a regular basis and I thought it seemly to allow members time to make other arrangements for future venues. Resigning from a political party is rather like a divorce, painful but necessary for all concerned.

Mr Evan Thornley recently elected Member for Southern Metro Region (Upper House) was the one politician who acknowledged my distress and responded to it.  Unfortunately his  conciliatory  letter came too late to prevent circumstances imploding upon me.  I was glad I had made the effort and scrutinized for him on the count back at the last election, as he quite rightly recognized the value of a working member of the party.   I valued his comments.  

Ms Ann Barker, Member for Oakleigh remained silent to the end (as I expected of her)


May 24 2007

It seems like an eternity ago…a life away….

Tag: Diarymary @ 1:30 pm

It has been a bit of a torrid week…..my “new” boisterous, energetic, lovable dog was killed by a car on Friday night, I was advised of a suicide on Sunday night, my daughter gave birth on Monday, and I got to meet bubs Tuesday, a very happy little vegemite he is too…along with his brothers who I have been honored to mind this past few days…..and it was only spoilt by the $107 dollar parking infringement notice.  Instead of telling drivers I was entering a private car park for Council Use Only, the sign along way away told me “No Standing”.  I’d never noticed a sign “No Standing” at the narrow opening because I was too busy navigating the entrance of which I thought was a football reserve public parking……So between $250 vet fee for Jack and a $107 fine…with an additional minor expense (?) of a new baby…my purse is rather battered but not to worry – I am alive! (and my baby is absolutely delightful, so’s mum and dad)

My dog did not die immediately but he received the appropriate injection and died without regaining consciousness.  Like I should be able to in similar circumstances… Was it only last Friday?  It seems like an eternity ago…a life away….

The suicide was of a young man of 21.   The friend of a friend…No one guessed, no one realised, no one could stop it….On being told the story I was so touched for his mother who found him hanging in the shed,,,,,,she had to get his body down with his feet just inches from the floor….He’d failed to tie the rope with the appropriate knot apparently and one can only hope he died relatively quickly in spite of this mistake….He’d not planned to long term to die…he’d recently bought items for his car which he loved….He didn’t have a girl friend, but he did have a job.  A job which didn’t really give him the necessary feelings of satisfaction…

The young don’t want to wait these days…Their education and training provides them with skills that have insufficient room to fill because so many are so qualified these days…I think it all makes a difference……We worked our way up through the school of hard knocks but our children expect to be the managing director by aged 25……

Just on Sunday morning’s entry down below I mentioned about relationships and how important it is to be able to say “I love you” because one never knows when it will be too late to have a loved one hear those precious words.

I was quite incensed to learn that Centrelink rang the young man’s mother on the Monday to see why she hadn’t turned up for her job interview…..she sobbed as she told them the reason only to have some moron from Centrelink ring back,  and remind her that she would need a doctor’s medical certificate to verify her story.   God!!!!!    I was relaying this occurrence with a very old long time friend and she reminded me that Centrelink did exactly the same to her while grieving for her just died mother of ovarian cancer some years ago.  She pleaded in vain for time out while she gathered her wits and equilibrium to no avail – they insisted proper protocol be followed.

and beyondblue spend millions on people preventative suicide when the answer to why people would feel pushed beyond endurance is staring them in the face.    Even sadder perhaps is that we remain apathetic about making Centrelink a much more compassionate face of Government bureaucracy.    We just don’t seem to care about each other in a way that was totally natural to me as a young woman.

Centrelink are very lucky they didn’t end up with a second suicide FOLLOWING  their lack of sensitivity – the IDIOTS!

On a much brighter note the really good news to share is that Dr Philip Nitschke will stand for the Seat of Menzies in the Doncaster area in the upcoming election against Kevin Andrews, the Liberal Minister responsible, together with the help of the Labor Party,  for overturning the Northern Territory legislation, Rights of the Terminally Ill.   Mr Andrews introduced a Private Member’s Bill which was able to get to the top of the pile within weeks to achieve the outcome he did.  Not enough parliamentary ministers have first hand knowledge of what comfort having the right to choice for end of life decisions.  

Hopefully between Philip and the Green’s Bob Brown this can be rectified with the upcoming election…..Expected to be held in November, if living in Menzies whether you be 20 or a 100 crawl to the booths and vote!!! please….. 

One can only hope Philip receives lots of financial support to cover the costs incurred in undertaking this exercise from like minded individuals and also physical support in getting his message out to the electorate.   Philip will stand as an Independent  but holds strong views about a broad range of issues including the environment.  


May 20 2007

Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs Interview

Tag: Diarymary @ 10:31 am

There will be little surprise at this Minister’s lack of support for voluntary euthanasia and actually remembering their there to govern for the people not their own conservative views…..Capital punishment or Voluntary Euthanasia is about what the community as a whole would accept….80% in favor is higher in itself that any one government’s mandate to act on our behalf, usually scraping through with preferences….80% support of any initiative has to been treated with the respect it deserves whether government ministers disapprove personally or not…..It is not about giving them power to implement their own views but the will of the people!

http://www.alp.org.au/media/0507/tvifa170.php

Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs
TV Interview – 17th May 2007

REYNE: 10 years of a John Howard Government has seen children overboard, detention centres, Australian troops in Iraq and the Kyoto signature but no intention to comply. Have the decisions made by Australia on a global level damaged our international reputation.

WATKINS: Is it time we got off the bench and we took a more active role in the world arena? Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Robert McClelland believes so and he joins us on the couch this morning.

McCLELLAND: Good morning.

WATKINS: Probably first what is Labor’s response to what Bron had to say before? Does Labor have a policy that they will change on euthanasia?

McCLELLAND: It’s one of those issues that we have a conscience vote on.
I have to say it was intensely debated in the Parliament. It was a good debate from a personal point of view I voted in opposition to allowing euthanasia. There’s views held passionately on either side.

WATKINS: Can I ask why?

McCLELLAND: Personally. I was a lawyer before going into Parliament and I saw some unsavoury things, I shouldn’t damn them, by son in laws.
Pressure under wills and so forth. I just don’t want a person in a vulnerable position to be susceptible to pressure from in particular son in laws. That’s my prejudice to do something that perhaps they wouldn’t otherwise consider.

REYNE: It is very difficult for an elected official to come out and say yes we are on the side of you being able to kill yourself.

McCLELLAND: It is and you just don’t know the surrounding pressure that someone may be under at the time. It’s a hard issue I can see.

WATKINS: Can you see a time in Australian politics where it will be legalised, bearing in mind we’re looking now at 70-80% of the population according to polls support it?

McCLELLAND: It is very hard to say. It’s one of those areas where I think if you polled the community that the majority in favour of capital punishment. In that respect fortunately our national leadership from both sides is opposed to capital punishment. I think there is a degree of similarity in the issues. I think it is very difficult for elected leaders to endorse the killing of a citizen. I think that is the psyche that will prevail for a long long time.

———————-

Like me others would have watched Parkinson last night on channel two.  Among his guests was Shane Richie who starred in a film about a family with Parkinson’s involved.   As part of his role the Director had the main cast participate in a workshop being undertaken by Parkinson sufferers and their carers.   Shane remarked that until that confronting requirement to become involved in genuine suffering up close he didn’t really empathize with how serious illness can impact on the individual and their families.    He came home with a much better understanding of how suffering means life is “short” and we need to tell our loved ones that they are in fact, loved.

Shane, demonstrating how his gruff father coped with his “I love you, Dad” in an environment where such sentiments were not normally expressed.   It reminded me that I haven’t said those words myself to any family member in recent times, although when younger it came much easier to me…..Just to get the message through Shane repeated it three times amid great hilarity by the audience, but we all know they are very treasured words to hear, in spite of how we may appear to react on the surface….I find it easier to say to my sister and daughters rather than to male members….and it is something I must correct without delay.

As Shane Richie says, we just don’t know if we’ll be given the opportunity again, if we miss it because of shyness….What’s to be “shy” about making another person feel good.   Giving them a sense of worth and belonging which comes back immediately in return.

It does me good to know I don’t have to go to church on Sunday to pray in order to achieve a sense of satisfaction and goodwill about my deeds for the day.

What did the man himself say when I said “I love you” …..ehhhh???  like it is too early for you to have been drinking!!!


May 18 2007

“Sicko” Is Completed and We’re Off to Cannes!

Tag: Diarymary @ 4:45 pm

Dear Health Freedom Advocate,

An email from Michael Moore……

“Sicko” Is Completed and We’re Off to Cannes!
May 17, 2007

Friends,

It’s a wrap! My new film, “Sicko,” is all done and will have its world premiere this Saturday night at the Cannes Film Festival. As with “Bowling for Columbine” and “Fahrenheit 9/11,” we are honored to have been chosen by this prestigious festival to screen our work there.

My intention was to keep “Sicko” under wraps and show it to virtually no one before its premiere in Cannes. That is what I have done and, as you may have noticed if you are a recipient of my infrequent Internet letters, I have been very silent about what I’ve been up to. In part, that’s because I was working very hard to complete the film. But my silence was also because I knew that the health care industry — an industry which makes up more than 15 percent of our GDP — was not going to like much of what they were going to see in this movie and I thought it best not to upset them any sooner than need be.

Well, going quietly to Cannes, I guess, was not to be. For some strange reason, on May 2nd the Bush administration initiated an action against me over how I obtained some of the content they believe is in my film. As none of them have actually seen the film (or so I hope!), they decided, unlike with “Fahrenheit 9/11,” not to wait until the film was out of the gate and too far down the road to begin their attack.

Bush’s Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, launched an investigation of a trip I took to Cuba to film scenes for the movie. These scenes involve a group of 9/11 rescue workers who are suffering from illnesses obtained from working down at Ground Zero. They have received little or no help with their health care from the government. I do not want to give away what actually happens in the movie because I don’t want to spoil it for you (although I’m sure you’ll hear much about it after it unspools Saturday). Plus, our lawyers have advised me to say little at this point, as the film goes somewhere far scarier than “Cuba.” Rest assured of one thing: no laws were broken. All I’ve done is violate the modern-day rule of journalism that says, “ask no questions of those in power or your luncheon privileges will be revoked.”

This preemptive action taken by the Bush administration on the eve of the “Sicko” premiere in Cannes led our attorneys to fear for the safety of our film, noting that Secretary Paulson may try to claim that the content of the movie was obtained through a violation of the trade embargo that our country has against Cuba and the travel laws that prohibit average citizens of our free country from traveling to Cuba. (The law does not prohibit anyone from exercising their first amendment right of a free press and documentaries are protected works of journalism.)

I was floored when our lawyers told me this. “Are you saying they might actually confiscate our movie?” “Yes,” was the answer. “These days, anything is possible. Even if there is just a 20 percent chance the government would seize our movie before Cannes, does anyone want to take that risk?”

Certainly not. So there we were last week, spiriting a duplicate master negative out of the country just so no one from the government would take it from us. (Seriously, I can’t believe I just typed those words! Did I mention that I’m an American, and this is America and NO ONE should ever have to say they had to do such a thing?)

I mean, folks, I have just about had it. Investigating ME because I’m trying to help some 9/11 rescue workers our government has abandoned? Once again, up is down and black is white. There are only two people in need of an investigation and a trial, and the desire for this across America is so widespread you don’t even need to see the one’s smirk or hear the other’s sneer to know who I am talking about.

But no, I’m the one who now has to hire lawyers and sneak my documentary out of the country just so people can see a friggin’ movie. I mean, it’s just a movie! What on earth could I have placed on celluloid that would require such a nonsensical action against me?

Ok. Scratch that.

Well, I’m on my way to Cannes right now, a copy of the movie in my bag. Don’t feel too bad for me, I’ll be in the south of France for a week! But then it’s back to the U.S. for a number of premieres and benefits and then, finally, a chance for all of you to see this film that I have made. Circle June 29th on your calendar because that’s when it opens in theaters everywhere across the country and Canada (for the rest of the world, it opens in the fall)

I can’t wait for you to see it.
Yours,
Michael Moore


P.S. I will write more about what happens from Cannes. Stay tuned on my website, MichaelMoore.com.

Michael Bending
Alliance for Health Freedom Australia

http://www.ahf-au.org

‘All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing’
- Edmund Burke (1729-1797), Irish born writer and politician -


May 18 2007

Assisted suicide case full of holes: defence lawyer

Tag: Diarymary @ 10:15 am

My husband’s new mantra: “I am not always right – But I am never wrong!”   (sounds like Prime Minister Howard to me though)

Choice comments:  This article out of Canada just demonstrates that beyondblue is not unique in its concerns about suicide rates.   Australian politicians need to understand that voluntary euthanasia will not go away for them as an issue.  Eventually a brave leader will step up to the lectern and tell us the leaders are now following it citizens in progressive reform for implementing voluntary euthanasia into Australia (again!).   Voluntary euthanasia is not the same as suicide due to depression.  We need to take the emotional baggage out of its implementation and accept it for what it is…a viable alternative to living in intolerable pain due to physical impairment.   We each deal with our pain differently which is why we call it “choice in end of life decisions”.

2007-05-16 From: Canada.com
Assisted suicide case full of holes: defence lawyer

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=1c71f9fa-0c9f-49b4-8e37-740532e68910&k=10458

Phil Couvrette,
CanWest News Service

A 29-year-old man has been charged with helping an uncle, who suffered from muscular dystrophy, commit suicide.

The death was in September 2006, but the charges were only laid on Tuesday, months after police launched an investigation into the man, Stephane Dufour.

His uncle, Chantal Maltais, 49, was confined to a wheelchair. Dufour is accused of helping him hang himself, but his attorney, Michel Boudreault, says the case against him is very weak.

“It’s in our favour that 12 people will be able to pour over the reasons for these charges,” he said of the jury that will decide Dufour’s fate. “The charges are full of holes.”

The jury will eventually have to launch into a debate on whether the law should be amended, he added.

Dufour could face up to 14 years in prison if convicted of assisting or encouraging someone to commit suicide.

Dufour is out on bail until he appears, on July 17, at the courthouse in Alma, Que., 200 kilometres north of Quebec City.

Boudreault said his client, who will plead not guilty, is living through a very difficult situation.

The trial is taking place nearly a year after Maltais’ death because some family members wondered how he could hang himself unassisted, which prompted the police investigation.

Boudreault said Maltais wanted to die on the anniversary of his mother’s death.

Reached at work, one of Maltais’ five brothers, Gaetan, said he was “very relieved” by the death “because he had suffered so much” late in life.

He said Dufour is supported by most of the family.

Gaetan’s wife, Lina, said they were shocked to learn about the trial.

Maltais had suffered from the disease since he was four, Lina said, and suffered “like a martyr” but was constantly helped by his nephew.

She said Maltais openly talked about putting an end to his life and family members eventually stopped trying to dissuade him.

In 2001, Evode Pelletier, from nearby Chicoutimi, was sentenced to 12 months in jail after helping his depressive partner end her life with the help of cyanide.

Last October Andre Bergeron, a Sherbrooke, Que. man admitted helping to kill his severely disabled wife, but a judge spared him prison time.

It isn’t unusual for the family to become convinced that someone is suffering too much to live, even to the point of helping them commit suicide, said Louis Lemay from Quebec’s Association for the Prevention of Suicide. He called Maltais’ death “a tragedy.”

While his degenerative disease couldn’t be cured, it’s very rare that nothing can be done to relieve physical suffering, he said.

“Did he have the appropriate (medical) treatment? Didn’t he in fact suffer from depression?” wondered Lemay. “Even doctors sometimes don’t have the right approach to relieve the pain.”

Suicide is becoming one of Quebec’s greatest health problems, his group insisted. It is the leading cause of death for men under 40 and Quebec’s overall suicide rate leads the country.

and another article about the same circumstances:

2007-05-16 From: Toronto Star, ON, CA
Quebec case rekindles assisted suicide debate

http://www.thestar.com/News/article/214694

May 16, 2007 05:59 PM
Les Perreaux
Canadian press

MONTREAL – The case of a Quebec man accused of helping his sick uncle hang himself is threatening to renew pressure on Ottawa to overhaul Canada’s law on assisted suicide.

Stephan Dufour, 29, was arrested this week on a charge of assisting the suicide of his uncle Chantal Maltais, who suffered from muscular dystrophy.

Investigators with Quebec provincial police say the 49-year-old Maltais hanged himself Sept. 8, 2006.

Police arrested Dufour after a lengthy investigation. He has been released on a promise to appear in court July 17 in Alma, Que.

“The nephew was taking care of the uncle, he did a lot of work taking care of him,” said Sgt. Pierre Lavoie of the Quebec provincial police in the Lac-St-Jean region 250 kilometres northeast of Quebec City.

“When our investigators questioned the nephew, a few elements came out that led us to believe a charge of assisted suicide could be brought against him,” Lavoie said Wednesday.

Dufour’s lawyer, Michel Boudreault, told reporters that Maltais suffered terribly for years and hounded Dufour to help him kill himself.

Maltais even picked his own date to die.

“It was the same date his mother died,” Boudreault told reporters in Alma.

“He wanted to die for many years, maybe 10 to 15 years. Chantal made his funeral arrangements. He said his body was a prison. He made several suicide attempts, without success.”

“The choice of his nephew was a logic choice for him. Out of naiveté, Stephan Dufour was the logical person to turn to,” the defence lawyer said.

Quebec has had several cases in the past 18 months that have ignited debate in the province over whether Canada should regulate assisted suicide.

From the Alma hanging to a death by drug cocktail and a botched attempt at asphyxiation, the Quebec cases highlight the grisly results when desperate people with little medical knowledge try to help loved ones end their lives.

“It’s terrible and makes no sense,” said Yvon Bureau, an author and activist who is pushing for a highly regulated system in Canada that would allow people to end their lives with less pain.

Such systems exist in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Bureau says 80 per cent of Canadians consistently support the idea but politicians fear an extremely vocal minority that will make them pay a steep political price.

“These are people who are pro-life, or believe in life at all costs,” Bureau said. “The five per cent of pro-life extremists can overwhelm them.”

Bloc Quebecois MP Francine Lalonde has pushed for assisted suicide legislation and she says many MPs share her opinion. But her private members bills on the subject have never been pushed ahead.

“This just doesn’t make sense, and the case of this poor young man is sad and illustrates it,” she said in an interview from Ottawa.

“It’s a delicate question and there are people who are against it. But I think more and more, particularly in Quebec, we recognize the need to change the law, with serious boundaries to prevent abuse.

“But right now there are abuses in Quebec and English Canada happening in silence. And we must end that too.”

Assisted suicide rose to the national agenda in the 1990s when Sue Rodriguez fought all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada for the right to kill herself.

Rodriguez, who suffered from Lou Gehrig’s disease, lost in a split decision but killed herself anyway with the help of an unidentified physician in 1994.

Bureau says he is not in favour of allowing people to kill suffering relatives. But he says people like Dufour wouldn’t be moved to desperation if Canada allowed people to end pain-wracked lives with the patient’s clear consent and a proper medical procedure.

“The assistance must be medical, practised in a strict, secure framework,” Bureau said.

“These other kinds of acts have to stay criminal. But they would happen much less frequently if people had other alternatives.”

Two recent high-profile assisted suicide cases in Quebec involved two women named Marielle Houle.

In January 2006, one Marielle Houle was sentenced to three years probation for helping her son, playwright Charles Fariala, kill himself. Houle followed his instructions to help the 36-year-old, who suffered from multiple sclerosis, end his life with a cocktail of drugs.

Andre Bergeron received three years probation in October 2006, after pleading guilty to aggravated assault causing the death of his wife, who also happened to be named Marielle Houle.

Houle suffered from Friedreich’s ataxia, a degenerative and incurable disease. Bergeron boosted Houle’s dose of morphine and tried to suffocate her with a plastic bag.

She died several days later in hospital.


May 17 2007

Terminally tiresome.

Tag: Diarymary @ 7:15 pm

Letter published in The Age Green Guide today

Terminally tiresome.

Last Monday’s Four Corners program “Euthanasia: the next stage of the debate” was a wet squib. The whole program appeared to downplay any debate. The most convincing people appeared to be the elderly citizens who had thought deeply about the subject and discussed their attitudes rationally. The spokesperson for the AMA and the Right to Life groups were very inadequate:

                                        Betty Telscher, South Yarra

Betty is a feisty advocate for choice and dignity in dying.   She, like me, is tired of the rhetoric of talking, cajoling, begging our politicians to make legal provision for our elderly….she, like me, believes god help those who help themselves, and Betty like me is trying to make a difference for those who cannot lobby for themselves due to their ill health.

I don’t believe the Program intended to “debate” the issues precisely because we just go over the same monotonous scenarios again and again within “debates”   The Right to Life believe their POV is the only right decision to make whether it be their life or mine we’re talking about….We, on the other hand, Right to Die, believe it is a person’s individual right to choose for themselves, their end of life options….As for the AMA viewpoint, Doctor Capolingua should have realised in her line of work that sometimes the talking has to cease and meaningful action -  start…..The desperate ill are responding to their illness by not feeling like “being cheered up” when the dying process in about the only thing one has to look forward to.  But it could be a “more pleasant experience with Nembutal” than cheerful empty chat!


May 16 2007

Europeans grapple with right-to-die issue

Tag: Diarymary @ 5:10 pm

2007-05-15 From: International Herald-Tribune
Europeans grapple with right-to-die issue
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/15/europe/living.php?page=2

By Elisabeth Rosenthal
Published: May 15, 2007

ROME: When Pope John Paul II was dying of complications of Parkinson’s disease in 2005, he ultimately refused to return to a hospital from his Vatican quarters, rejecting interventions like breathing machines and kidney dialysis; he was dead a day later.

Despite high-profile cases like his, and other tragedies that can dominate the news, ordinary Italians do not have the clear right to reject aggressive medical treatment. Decades after the U.S. adopted living wills and health proxies, Europe is slowly moving in that direction. But resistance is also mounting from place to place, where the question of legal rights for the gravely ill get mixed up in a melee of other socially contentious issues, from euthanasia to gay marriage.

Here in Italy procedures are muddled, as they are in many other nations. The Constitution supports that right – but the medical code does not require doctors to respect it, and in fact instructs doctors to try to keep patients alive.

A new law is being debated in the Italian Senate that would affirm the right to reject aggressive treatment, but it is unlikely to have enough votes for passage any time soon. Other countries have adopted legislation only lately. France, Spain and Britain have passed “living will” laws only in the last two years.

For nearly two decades, the right to refuse medical treatment has been entrenched in U.S. law, and hospital patients must fill out forms indicating their wishes, called advanced directives. Many states were spurred on by landmark cases like those of Karen Ann Quinlan and Nancy Cruzan.

Many Europeans still do not have legal rights in this field, which religious lobbies, political divides and a more ideological political climate have made contentious. Instead of being seen as part of a patient’s right to have “informed consent” for medical procedures – as they generally were in the United States – living-will laws here are perceived as part of a constellation of issues like abortion, euthanasia and gay marriage.

“There is nothing here that protects you – it’s a wasteland,” said Beppino Englaro, whose daughter has been hospitalized in a deep coma and undergone many types of unwanted treatments here since an auto accident in 1992. “Eluana had been very explicit about her wishes and our request to the doctors was always the same. But they told us, ‘No, here in Italy we have a culture of life.’ ”

Pictured but not shown in this article:
Beppino Englaro, whose daughter has been in a coma for 15 years, is a campaigner for a living-will law. (Pigi Cipelli/IHT)

The family has been to court seven times to try to get life support stopped, and judges concluded that “stopping treatment is against the law.”

There are two types of advanced directives: living wills, in which patients indicate which procedures and treatments they would reject, if they fell into a hopeless, life-threatening situation. A second type, called a “medical power of attorney” or “health care proxy,” allows the patient to choose a person with the legal right to make such decisions on the patient’s behalf should he be incapacitated.

“There are so many inconsistencies and so much conceptual confusion here in Italy,” said Cristiano Vezzoni, an expert in European health care law at the University of Milan.

“Theoretically everyone recognizes the right to informed consent, and the theoretical right to refuse futile treatment,” Vezzoni said. “But then they say, ‘Oh you can not stop treatment if it would cause death.’ Or they argue that tube feedings should not count as medical treatment – even though it is internationally accepted that it is medical treatment in this case.”

Last year, Italy was galvanized by the case of Piergiorgio Welby, a poet with a progressive neurologic disorder who had petitioned repeatedly to be disconnected from the ventilator that kept him alive. A doctor complied with the request and Welby died. No one has been prosecuted, although there were calls for the physician to be charged with murder.

In Italy, as in many Catholic countries, there have been loudly voiced fears that allowing patients to refuse treatment could readily lapse into euthanasia. “We worry that the new law will introduce a form of euthanasia,” or assisted suicide, said Luisa Capitanio Santolini, of the Union of Christian Democrats. She worried, too, that the law would turn doctors into bureaucrats. “You can not bypass the judgment of the medical class to respect the desires of a sick person,” he said.

Only three European countries – Denmark, Belgium and Netherlands – have long had strong laws protecting the right to refuse treatment, said Penney Lewis, a reader in law at University College London.

Courts in some others, like Britain, have for the last decade generally supported the notion that people could refuse treatments that forestalls their death, including refusing artificial feeding. But they did not uniformly respect those wishes, unless a patient was gravely ill. And patients had no right to appoint proxies.

Britain passed a law in 2005 that takes effect in November. “As of November the practice will become codified in law, which is important,” Lewis said. “In Italy it’s been and remains very unclear for doctors and patients what you could and couldn’t do.”

Even new laws have been laced with religious politics and ambivalence. In Britain, at the urging of conservative policy makers and Anglican Bishops, lawmakers added a clause that patients could refuse treatment but “could not be motivated by a positive decision to cause death.”

France’s law protects the right to refuse lifesaving treatment, but only for the terminally ill.

Here in Rome, Senator Ignazio Marino, a transplant surgeon who practiced in the United States for many years, said the lack of clarity on the subject meant that doctors make life-or-death decisions in a hushed manner, afraid to consult patients for fear of prosecution.

“Most physicians in the ICU will decrease the intensity of treatment, but they do it in a way that is not declared or discussed – it’s all foggy,” he said, using the abbreviation for intensive care unit. “It’s like New Jersey in ‘76: We cannot say enough is enough, this person cannot get back to consciousness or meaningful existence. We cannot say, comfort measures only. We know it’s against the law.”

The Vatican’s own mixed messages on the subject have given ammunition to both sides of the debate. Pope Benedict XVI once wrote, “The stopping of medical procedures that are dangerous or extraordinary or disproportionate compared to the results you can expect could be legal and accepted.”

But terms like “extraordinary” and “disproportionate” are open to broad interpretation, and the Church deems food and water, even if through a tube, not to be a medical procedure.

Eluana Englaro has been in a deep coma in a hospital for more than 15 years, but during that time but has never needed dramatic life-support machines like a ventilator or a kidney dialysis. She has been given artificial feeding, liquids, seizure medicines and antibiotics for infections. Like Terri Schiavo, the Florida woman whose husband sued successfully to remove a feeding tube in 2005, she has been a magnet for controversy.

Her father says his daughter’s treatment should be withdrawn. His daughter understood the choices, he says, since a close friend of hers had been left comatose after a car crash the year before her own accident.

“We spoke openly about this – she had very direct knowledge about intensive care units and said this is not for me,” he said. “She trusted her parents to enact her wishes, but we couldn’t. It’s been 15 years that we’ve lived with this guilt.”

Choice Comments:  Without the guilt feelings and taking into account only what is best for the grievously ill – wouldn’t life be beautiful as the ABC promo keeps telling us…..Life is beautiful.

On quite another note I have to commend Jeff Kennett, CEO of beyondblue for standing up to the media about the treatment of the missing mother of the deserted baby.   He quite rightly told his interviewer that we have no knowledge of the mother’s circumstances and the only really important issue is her wellbeing.  The fact she left her baby in a hospital to be cared shows that she had an understanding of her ultimate responsibilities.   The baby may well be better off away from the mother’s living circumstances and she made the ultimate sacrifice to do what was best for the baby regardless of how she felt about it personally.

This afternoon I heard Jeff Kennett again about the living conditions of people living in rural Victorian and felt quite satisfied that with him running the show, it will achieve its ultimate objectives….Depression appears to be rife among a great many Australians because of a variety of reasons from drought, to debt, to broken marriages, to homeless people and then there are the end of life issues which will not go away….. Listening to Jeff Kennett gave me just a glimmer of hope, but I wouldn’t want him back as Premier of Victoria, and this is because he rode roughshod over thousands of people to achieve his goals….He wouldn’t listen then!


Next Page »