Dec 30 2006

How’s that for mental calisthenics at an early hour?

Tag: Diarymary @ 9:31 am

http://www.atheistfoundation.org.au/

A contributor’s emailed thoughts (received yesterday) as a result of her journey into the world of the atheist foundation website:

“Gut Morgen Kliene Schwester!

How’s that for mental calisthenics at an early hour?

I had a bit of a look at the atheist site and I go back to my earlier contention – my limited sense of God has nothing whatever to do with the nasty, jealous, vindictive old man of the bible. I can quite see why people would be too scared to ‘believe’ in anything so awful and unpredictable and like small children cover their face and pretend the monster doesn’t exist. But once you can get your head around the fact that the bible isn’t true and its conceptions of god have more to do with the way jewish people think than with reality, a whole new world opens up.

God, whoever or whatever he/she is, is still communicating with each and every thing in creation. The very fact that we need to communicate with our world and each other every minute of every day indicates to me that my unknown God is primarily a communicator. If we chop down the trees, God communicates their importance to us by a buildup of pollution and a lack of water. There are various names for this communication, fate, karma, reward, punishment, but it is just communication that our ideas require adjustment.

I don’t think we as a species are any more important than any other in the scheme of things, except for the fact that we are able to communicate self-realization. It then follows that as we learn more, more is expected of us if we are going to be successful human beings. This does not mean that the old man with the screwed up personality will ‘get’ us. It just means we will become more acutely aware of the results of our decisions and actions – rather like the way we suffer when we see our children reap the results of our errors and omissions as parents. As long as we make wise decisions (both personally and as a species) and learn from our mistakes, all will be well – there is nothing to fear except ignorance.

So, I don’t have the makings of an atheist – I find the thought that Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Stalin, George W Bush, John Howard et al are the very best and highest there is quite terrifying – they are, after all, only human………………..

The great current evil in the world, greed, is flourishing in the US and filters through to its allies (We DO become like those we mix with) And because you can’t have up without down, in without out, black without white, it therefore follows that the remedy for it will also be flourishing there. The current crop of new thinkers about spirituality and yes, God are mainly American or are being published by the US or UK. Our knowledge of God and the big picture is only in kindergarten stage – God is a quantum physicist, master mathematician and has a sense of humour – how can kindergarteners possibly say they know all about the chancellor of the university?

See I can go on like this for pages and pages, but RELAX – I won’t. A couple of songs come to mind just now – ” It’s a big, wide, wonderful world we live in, a Turkish delight, we’re in heaven, of all we survey we’re a gay Santa Claus, there’s a kingdom, power and glory………..”Welcome to my world, won’t you come on in, miracles I guess are happening now and then…………..”

Choice responds: Thank you for those pearly words of wisdom……you’ll know that I have no comprehension of why man is not proud enough and sufficient unto himself to believe that he alone is responsible for his action and their aftermath. Man alone, makes bombs and kills man, Man makes greed, arrogance, consumerism, beauty (?) and power an all encompassing way of being. Who is this God and why if he exists do half the world starve while the others consistently use and abuse every resource? Where is this God of Light, Joy and everlasting Love? I, along with half the world’s population do not believe such an entity exists.

I am looking forward to reading my gift “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins. The majority of the world’s population do not believe in a God….it has been established (probably from census figures) that the world’s population is about equally divided and who can prove or disprove the existence of such a being….I’m with Phillip Adams, if a great white bearded man appeared over Sydney Harbor I’d be down on my knees, or if mankind learnt to treat his fellow man with genuine love and compassion and without intimidation, then perhaps I could believe, but I doubt it.

Faith is a gift which cannot be bought for love or money, it can’t be faked. It must exist based on its own methods to convince intelligent human beings that regardless of lack of proof – all things are possible because of God. I always smile when we get “what we want” we thank God for it and yet when it doesn’t happen, we accept that it is God’s Will that it hasn’t!…I don’t believe the average Scientist sits in his laboratory waiting for God alone to “make things happen!”. Faith alone is not enough, but science alone is sufficient unto itself. Science is based on factual evidence, not a myth of possibilities.

I was asked recently how it is then that people in terrifying circumstances cry out for God’s Help to which I honestly responded that I felt it was just a reaction to fear and because we hear the terminology in everyday conversation, it is worth a try!!! Been then, done that myself….doesn’t work….The power of the mind ensures we understand the futility of the action even as the words are said….but for those who do “believe” then just the essence of their faith in a superior being rest their shattered nerves and calms their soul.

Why does Mr Bill Muehlenberg in his Herald Sun (29/12) article headed up Beware the Unbelievers? think those of who do no share a fairy story full of terror and horror from two thousand years ago, are someone to be afraid of? (as my 5 yo passenger told me, “Jesus was born and then he died, with his arms pinned!” all in the same breath) If Christianity humanizes people, how then do I remember my first twenty years of life, which closely aligned to the Catholic Church, as a period of great unhappiness. And there are thousands of bruised souls who remember only the ugliness of being a “believer”. Just recently the Exclusive Brethren made the news for splitting families up. Their businesses also have a special arrangement with the Government to ensure that their premises are not accessed by a Union member, by that I assume Health and Safety Officers would be excluded. Where will the bodies be buried?

As one very bright spark commented “who noticed “The Three Wise Men” came from the East!” (but then if they were so wise, why not bring some intelligent gifts like food and nappies, rather than incense). Or was that the start of the concept of consumerism, where luxury items were more sought after than the simple things in life?

I remember a story where Jesus threw the Traders out of the Temple, telling us that it easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than a rich man, into Heaven….. Yet the Christian Churches continue to build their great businesses in His Name and prosper….and yet still ask the man in the street for his golden dollar….even though they themselves are surrounded by the trappings of anything but poverty. Churches can afford to change their official vehicles each year because of the tax incentives, among others.

So much for Christian Charity…..and poverty! Has anyone visited an Opportunity Shop recently? Sometimes the prices asked exceed the cost of a new item and all this is clear profit because they’re given it for free. Recently when a friend of mine offered the Salvation Army a small fridge in excellent condition, it was not welcomed as it was “electrical and couldn’t be sold”. I was amazed and suggested that it need not be “sold” but given to a needy family…..The social arm of the Salvation Army consists in advising people of their financial rights……I am not too sure if any goods are actually distributed to family as distinct from sold to them at a “cheaper than shop price” which considering they get as free donations is a bit rich I feel. Eventually a lady within the Advice Bureau cottoned on to my dismay at their attitude and had us drive the fridge to her home personally……”She knew a family!!!” Well Good – but it shouldn’t have taken so long and three visits to varying addresses across suburbs to achieve a donated fridge finding its use!

Hence 99% of my discarded goods are left on the nature strip for anyone to help themselves free of charge. That is an Atheist for you though Mr Muehlenberg may think we are incapable of generosity, because we can’t believe in his God…..

Simplistic thinking that only matter, matters – can run along side truth, beauty, justice, love which even atheists can enjoy…..Perhaps Mr Bill Muehlenberg can learn from the ten myths about atheists, in my previous Diary Entry……he’ll learn perhaps that we are equal to him in our ability to live good lives, with or without a “Belief in God”.

If one doesn’t know that killing is morally wrong without the help of the Bible which promotes it on a regular basis, then we wouldn’t look to Religion to clarify that belief! Most of the deaths in the world are by people killing each other in the name of their particular belief system. So many valuable young lives stuffed out before they’ve had a chance to live and yet a terminally or chronically ill life suddenly becomes so selectively precious!! Mr Bush, President of the United States of America, along with our own Australian Prime Minister, Mr Howard are living proof of how Christianity creates the killing fields of the Middle East……Those same men believe a seriously ill person should be maintained to the bitter end of all the technology that God himself wouldn’t have dreamt possible two thousand years ago……As do the Jewish and Muslims religions also cry “weak tears of regrets about the taking of a life when dealing with the terminally ill”, yet think nothing of killing a three year old child in the name of war. Would the God of Love and Compassion we hear spoken about with such reverence be really impressed with our selectiveness in his name? Why should God aid any human being that is so hypocritical in their analysis of what is right and wrong for the total human community? At least Atheist are honest!

Perhaps I also need to remind the gentleman, who advises his reader to “Beware the Unbelievers”, that Hitler also was a Christian and achieved much of his infamous notoriety, with the assistance of the Churches at that time before selective tolerance became the flavor of the month……

I love my narrow world of Atheism and Mr Muehlenberg is right, – I never will fully enjoy nor understand his world but I have no trouble accepting his right to be different…..I can’t see that Mr Muehlenberg allows me that same right without believing in his own superiority…… A Humanist viewpoint is that one seeks to leave the world a better place than they found it.

In closing:

Thank you to the half dozen people who’ve made themselves known to me this week. I was heartened in particular by the very young (teenagers) who’ve told me of their support. But I believe it will be a hard unfruitful year but I said in my Season’s Greeting card to my Sitting Member who does not support my views, that I hope to continue to pester her for another four years….

One middle aged lady who approached me yesterday told me of her niece who was given three weeks to live (Brain Tumor) without medical intervention, and three months should she attempt a delay with medical assistance. The niece chose the three weeks and died a peaceful death without any loss of quality to her life. A young woman in her prime!…… Fortunately for her, the family supported her decision.

Yes, the “documentary” tattoo is genuine, for the record….and yes, I did pour the Nembutal down the toilet bowl……and no, I didn’t have a second bottle stashed in my luggage which was checked by Customs regardless…I entered with a straw hat undeclared, but purchased a year before in Australia and therefore an oversight on my part…..

One can only hope (and pray? Perhaps faith will work, where activism doesn’t!) that one of the minor political parties will have a stroke of courage and introduce a Bill into Parliament which can be debated along conscience votes for the individual rather than the Party Lines which is total avoidance of the inevitable…..


Dec 29 2006

The Most-Avoided Conversation in Medicine

Tag: Diarymary @ 2:10 pm

I feel this American Doctor’s story could be translated into any Australian hospital situation even today……

2006-12-26 From: New York Times
The Most-Avoided Conversation in Medicine

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/26/opinion/26chen.html?_r=1&ref=health&oref=slogin

By PAULINE W. CHEN
Published: December 26, 2006

Boston

J. R. was an auto mechanic of French Canadian descent with a perfectly square gap between his two front teeth and the slightly off-kilter face of a retired boxer. Soon after I met him on the surgical ward, after he had been found to have cancer, he developed a habit of planting himself in front of me whenever I got within 100 feet of his room, to spin stories about his life, wax poetic about his girlfriend, and offer free auto-repair advice.

I thought we had caught the tumor in J. R.’s colon early, but in the operating room we found that the cancer had grown into his pelvic sidewalls. After surgery, when I began to tell him that some of his cancer remained, he stopped me. “Hey, Doc,” he said. “I know I’m going to be fine because you did my surgery.”

J. R. sent me a Christmas card that year, but I could not bring myself to write back. I told myself that I was too busy, when in fact I was afraid to acknowledge that J. R. was dying. Patient deaths, for many doctors, represent a kind of failure, and so without really thinking, we look the other way.

I am not the only doctor who has had difficulty dealing with dying patients. Researchers who in the mid-1990s observed more than 9,000 seriously ill patients in five American teaching hospitals found substantial shortcomings in the care of the dying. More than a third spent at least 10 of their last days in intensive care. Among patients who remained conscious until death, half suffered moderate to severe pain. And fewer than half of their physicians knew whether or not their patients wanted to avoid cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

The researchers then made a multimillion-dollar effort to improve communication between patients and doctors on end-of-life care. They generated frequent reports to physicians on patients’ expected survival and hired specially trained nurses to talk with patients, families, physicians and hospital staff about prognoses, pain control and advance care planning.

Yet after two years, the problems they had identified were undiminished. The changes in practice had done nothing to get physicians to better communicate with dying patients. As the investigators wrote, the doctors “did not wish to directly confront problems or face choices.”

This study ­ called the Support trial ­ was a wake-up call for the medical profession. Physician leaders responded by creating specialized curriculums in end-of-life care, and licensing boards widened their competency requirements to include this expertise. Professional organizations issued mandates to improve standards of care for the terminally ill, while hospitals began offering more palliative care consultation services. Interest in end-of-life care surged; by early 2005, the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine grew to more than 2,000 members, from only 250 in 1988.

Still, many of us remain unwilling to talk with patients about death.

In a recent Harvard survey, nearly half of attending physicians at teaching hospitals refused to participate in a 25-minute telephone interview to discuss end-of-life care education. The most cited reason? They were not interested in the study. Other reasons included being too busy, refusing to participate without payment, or believing that end-of-life care had no relevance to their work.

J. R. continued writing to me every Christmas for three years longer than I would have expected, given the extent of his tumor. Then one year there was no card, and none the next year or the one after. After four years, I found the courage to write to him, and a month later, his girlfriend replied. J. R. had died but had managed to marry her first and to send me that last Christmas card.

And I was left wondering how I, and all doctors, could ever do better by our dying patients.

I think there is a simple way to change. We could add one question to every discussion we have about patients with terminal illnesses: “How good is this patient’s end-of-life care?”

The forums for posing this question are plentiful in medicine. Every morning and late afternoon, physicians in hospitals “round” on their patients, discussing their decisions in small groups or writing progress notes on patients’ charts. Doctors hold “grand rounds” (lectures before their colleagues) monthly or weekly, and in academic centers, physicians hold regular teaching conferences.

If in these settings we could bring ourselves to ask about each patient’s end-of-life care, we could influence one another in a more personal way than the Support study did. And while we might not get all the details right at first, we would grow more familiar with advance directives and pain treatment and learn to manage our patients’ resuscitation wishes.

We also might find ourselves ­ as I have found myself with patients since J. R. ­ one step closer to being the compassionate doctors we have always dreamed of becoming.

Pauline W. Chen is the author of the forthcoming “Final Exam: A Surgeon’s Reflections on Mortality.”


Dec 27 2006

10 myths—and 10 truths—about atheism

Tag: Diarymary @ 4:13 pm

10 myths—and 10 truths—about atheism

By Sam Harris
December 24, 2006
The Los Angeles Times

SEVERAL POLLS indicate that the term “atheism” has acquired such an extraordinary stigma in the United States that being an atheist is now a perfect impediment to a career in politics (in a way that being black, Muslim or homosexual is not). According to a recent Newsweek poll, only 37% of Americans would vote for an otherwise qualified atheist for president.

Atheists are often imagined to be intolerant, immoral, depressed, blind to the beauty of nature and dogmatically closed to evidence of the supernatural.

Even John Locke, one of the great patriarchs of the Enlightenment, believed that atheism was “not at all to be tolerated” because, he said, “promises, covenants and oaths, which are the bonds of human societies, can have no hold upon an atheist.”

That was more than 300 years ago. But in the United States today, little seems to have changed. A remarkable 87% of the population claims “never to doubt” the existence of God; fewer than 10% identify themselves as atheists — and their reputation appears to be deteriorating.

Given that we know that atheists are often among the most intelligent and scientifically literate people in any society, it seems important to deflate the myths that prevent them from playing a larger role in our national discourse.

1) Atheists believe that life is meaningless.

On the contrary, religious people often worry that life is meaningless and imagine that it can only be redeemed by the promise of eternal happiness beyond the grave. Atheists tend to be quite sure that life is precious. Life is imbued with meaning by being really and fully lived. Our relationships with those we love are meaningful now; they need not last forever to be made so. Atheists tend to find this fear of meaninglessness … well … meaningless.

2) Atheism is responsible for the greatest crimes in human history.

People of faith often claim that the crimes of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot were the inevitable product of unbelief. The problem with fascism and communism, however, is not that they are too critical of religion; the problem is that they are too much like religions. Such regimes are dogmatic to the core and generally give rise to personality cults that are indistinguishable from cults of religious hero worship. Auschwitz, the gulag and the killing fields were not examples of what happens when human beings reject religious dogma; they are examples of political, racial and nationalistic dogma run amok. There is no society in human history that ever suffered because its people became too reasonable.

3) Atheism is dogmatic.

Jews, Christians and Muslims claim that their scriptures are so prescient of humanity’s needs that they could only have been written under the direction of an omniscient deity. An atheist is simply a person who has considered this claim, read the books and found the claim to be ridiculous. One doesn’t have to take anything on faith, or be otherwise dogmatic, to reject unjustified religious beliefs. As the historian Stephen Henry Roberts (1901-71) once said: “I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”

4) Atheists think everything in the universe arose by chance.

No one knows why the universe came into being. In fact, it is not entirely clear that we can coherently speak about the “beginning” or “creation” of the universe at all, as these ideas invoke the concept of time, and here we are talking about the origin of space-time itself.

The notion that atheists believe that everything was created by chance is also regularly thrown up as a criticism of Darwinian evolution. As Richard Dawkins explains in his marvelous book, “The God Delusion,” this represents an utter misunderstanding of evolutionary theory. Although we don’t know precisely how the Earth’s early chemistry begat biology, we know that the diversity and complexity we see in the living world is not a product of mere chance. Evolution is a combination of chance mutation and natural selection. Darwin arrived at the phrase “natural selection” by analogy to the “artificial selection” performed by breeders of livestock. In both cases, selection exerts a highly non-random effect on the development of any species.

5) Atheism has no connection to science.

Although it is possible to be a scientist and still believe in God — as some scientists seem to manage it — there is no question that an engagement with scientific thinking tends to erode, rather than support, religious faith. Taking the U.S. population as an example: Most polls show that about 90% of the general public believes in a personal God; yet 93% of the members of the National Academy of Sciences do not. This suggests that there are few modes of thinking less congenial to religious faith than science is.

6) Atheists are arrogant.

When scientists don’t know something — like why the universe came into being or how the first self-replicating molecules formed — they admit it. Pretending to know things one doesn’t know is a profound liability in science. And yet it is the life-blood of faith-based religion. One of the monumental ironies of religious discourse can be found in the frequency with which people of faith praise themselves for their humility, while claiming to know facts about cosmology, chemistry and biology that no scientist knows. When considering questions about the nature of the cosmos and our place within it, atheists tend to draw their opinions from science. This isn’t arrogance; it is intellectual honesty.

7) Atheists are closed to spiritual experience.

There is nothing that prevents an atheist from experiencing love, ecstasy, rapture and awe; atheists can value these experiences and seek them regularly. What atheists don’t tend to do is make unjustified (and unjustifiable) claims about the nature of reality on the basis of such experiences. There is no question that some Christians have transformed their lives for the better by reading the Bible and praying to Jesus. What does this prove? It proves that certain disciplines of attention and codes of conduct can have a profound effect upon the human mind. Do the positive experiences of Christians suggest that Jesus is the sole savior of humanity? Not even remotely — because Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims and even atheists regularly have similar experiences.

There is, in fact, not a Christian on this Earth who can be certain that Jesus even wore a beard, much less that he was born of a virgin or rose from the dead. These are just not the sort of claims that spiritual experience can authenticate.
8) Atheists believe that there is nothing beyond human life and human understanding.

Atheists are free to admit the limits of human understanding in a way that religious people are not. It is obvious that we do not fully understand the universe; but it is even more obvious that neither the Bible nor the Koran reflects our best understanding of it. We do not know whether there is complex life elsewhere in the cosmos, but there might be. If there is, such beings could have developed an understanding of nature’s laws that vastly exceeds our own. Atheists can freely entertain such possibilities. They also can admit that if brilliant extraterrestrials exist, the contents of the Bible and the Koran will be even less impressive to them than they are to human atheists.

From the atheist point of view, the world’s religions utterly trivialize the real beauty and immensity of the universe. One doesn’t have to accept anything on insufficient evidence to make such an observation.

9) Atheists ignore the fact that religion is extremely beneficial to society.

Those who emphasize the good effects of religion never seem to realize that such effects fail to demonstrate the truth of any religious doctrine. This is why we have terms such as “wishful thinking” and “self-deception.” There is a profound distinction between a consoling delusion and the truth.

In any case, the good effects of religion can surely be disputed. In most cases, it seems that religion gives people bad reasons to behave well, when good reasons are actually available. Ask yourself, which is more moral, helping the poor out of concern for their suffering, or doing so because you think the creator of the universe wants you to do it, will reward you for doing it or will punish you for not doing it?

10) Atheism provides no basis for morality.

If a person doesn’t already understand that cruelty is wrong, he won’t discover this by reading the Bible or the Koran — as these books are bursting with celebrations of cruelty, both human and divine. We do not get our morality from religion. We decide what is good in our good books by recourse to moral intuitions that are (at some level) hard-wired in us and that have been refined by thousands of years of thinking about the causes and possibilities of human happiness.

We have made considerable moral progress over the years, and we didn’t make this progress by reading the Bible or the Koran more closely. Both books condone the practice of slavery — and yet every civilized human being now recognizes that slavery is an abomination. Whatever is good in scripture — like the golden rule — can be valued for its ethical wisdom without our believing that it was handed down to us by the creator of the universe


Dec 24 2006

We must not forget our pets over this holiday season

Tag: Diarymary @ 10:14 am

We must not forget our pets over this holiday season….they don’t know it’s Christmas Time (Christ’s Birthday) or if Eastern Orthodox Church, January 7th,  or Hanukkah (Jewish Celebration Festival of Lights), or perhaps a Muslim Holy Day in which case it wouldn’t really matter as it is my understanding, they see animals as unclean, dogs in particular.

The following words of wisdom have been reproduced from Religion for Dummies (As a professed Humanist, thank goodness,  I disagree with the following statements but uphold their right to be different.)

Religious positions on Euthanasia:

Deliberately taking a life, even a painful one is quite a bit different from withdrawing treatment and letting nature take its course, which in most cases will inevitably end in death.   For these reasons, every religious tradition considers active euthanasia wrong and opposes it as murder.   Passive euthanasia is another matter, one that is much harder to call.

When Death is imminent:

If the action involves stopping medical treatment which only purpose is to delay death and not heal, there is good religious justification for accepting that act as a moral act.   Judaism, for example, specifically prohibits doing anything to hasten the death of a dying person, but it allows the removal of “obstacles to death”.   In the one picturesque example, a woodchopper is making noise outside the room of a dying person and this noise is keeping the dying person from dying.  The law is that the woodchopper must stop.  From this, many rabbis have ruled that removing medical obstacles to death is also permitted.

When the Quality of life is the Issue:

Other situations aren’t so clear.   What happens, for example, when a person in a persistent vegetative state will never awaken from a coma and is being fed through stomach feeding tubes or intravenous lines.   His or her condition isn’t life threatening.   Can you remove feeding tubes as an act of passive euthanasia, or must you continue to feed and hydrate the patient no matter what the physical condition?   Some say depriving such a patient of food and water is the same as starving the person to death; as such, it’s active euthanasia and murder.  Others say that such a person is dying and that feeding in such an unnatural way causes more pain and serves only to delay death.

Some religious traditions don’t view suffering as evil, but as a test and a challenge, and part of the spiritual journey of life into death.   Zoroastrianism, for example, see life as a struggle against evil.  Evil is regarded as the source of pain, suffering and death.   So to take life in order to remove suffering from another or oneself is to commit a major evil action that supposedly bars the soul from heaven.  Islam also is against any form of euthanasia.   The reason is that all things, including disability and suffering, come from Allah.  To surrender to Allah’s will means to trust that he knows best and accept that which he gives you.   In dealing with end of life issues, Muslims believe in accepting tragedy with fortitude and making the suffering person as comfortable as possible.

“And no soul can die but with Allah’s permission – the term is fixed”  (Qur’an 3:14)

Quality of Life arguments for euthanasia are generally outside the religious frame of moral reference.  Quality of life doesn’t matter to religious morality.  If our lives have high quality, that’s good.  Nevertheless, even lives that are full of suffering and pain are still gifts from God.

Suffering euthanasia, and Eastern Religions:

Buddhist literature rarely discusses euthanasia.  Strong Zen traditions exist in Japan that tolerate suicide, and stories are told of how Siddhartha Gautama allowed monks to kill themselves.   Theravada Buddhism in Thailand, on the other hand, appears to be decidedly against any form of euthanasia.

Hindus consider all life sacred and so would be generally against that taking of life.  They argue the issue of euthanasia from the POV of motive.   Taking a life for personal gain is always wrong, but taking life out of compassion for the individual may be acceptable.

Nevertheless, many of these religious traditions see life as a journey toward enlightenment that can several lifetimes to achieve.   The primary task of these journeys is to be purified of attachments, including our attachment to such issues as the quality of life.

What about Suicide?

Most Western religious traditions condemn suicide for many of the same reasons they condemn active euthanasia.  Taking your own life – for whatever the reason – shows lack of faith and trust in God.

In Islam, suicide is a illegal as murder.   God, alone knows the reason for why things are the way they are, creates and owns all souls.  Life is a test, and suffering has purpose, even though you may not understand what that purpose is.  Suicide doesn’t really stop suffering; it simply compounds the problems.   The reason is that, on earth, souls have less awareness of the truth: after death, however, things become more apparent.  Only after death can people fully realize their actions hurt others.  This knowledge plagues them because they are unable to make amends.

Many Christian traditions see suicide as unforgivable.   The reason? Suicide is a mortal sin, that is, a sin committed deliberately and in full knowledge of the act.  The only way to get back into God’s good graces after you commit a mortal sin is to repent.  See the problem with suicide?   You can’t repent because you’re dead.

Nowadays, some Christian traditions, including Roman Catholicism , have softened their stance on suicide being an unforgivable sin.   They use the mindset of the person to determine how responsible they are for their actions.   The argument that most people are not themselves and not in control of their actions when they become desperate enough or depressed enough to see death as the only solution.  Therefore, the desperate act of suicide doesn’t automatically cut people off from God’s grace (but it’s still a bad idea).

CALLING all Doctors/Scientists/Legal Minds/Ethicists:

Euthanasia is an example of how ancient religions must now begin to update their moral codes to accommodate previously unimaginable circumstances.   In the old days, death came early and quickly.  Our modern capability of postponing death without really healing a person has complicated the old rules.   The old rules are not obsolete, however:   What the world needs now are new and creative religious leaders who are well versed in modern medicine and law as they are in ancient theology.

Choice comments:  I could wish the same religious bodies would treat the healthy living souls of those caught up in wars and terrorism with the respect they “sprout about” in dealing with end of life choices.  Then,  I may believe their viewpoints are genuine.   Be they Jewish, Christian, Islamic, Buddhist, Hindu or a dozen other interpretations of the same thing they all kill in the name of their God, interceding for victory for themselves with the same God,  when it suits them.  Life is not so very precious then, either in this one or the next one!    And then there are the David Hicks of this world, entombed alive at the mercy of the Christians who are so sanctimonious about others must live their lives.  Despicable actions in His Name! At least the Catholic Italians and the American Evangelists have their lack of human kindness to share.


Dec 23 2006

No Catholic funeral for euthanasia man From correspondents in Rome

Tag: Diarymary @ 11:19 am

No Catholic funeral for euthanasia man From correspondents in Rome

December 23, 2006 12:00

Article from: Agence France-Presse

Send this article: Print Email </dailytelegraph/email/popup/0,22050,20967590-5001028,00.html>

THE Italian Catholic Church today said right-to-die campaigner Piergiorgio Welby cannot have a religious funeral because his assisted death was against Church teaching, Italian television reported.

“Piergiorgio Welby’s wish to end his life, stated repeatedly in public, is contrary to Catholic doctrine,” the Church said in a statement cited by Rai television.

Mr Welby, who authored a book titled Let Me Die, sparked a national debate on euthanasia in September when he wrote a heart-rending open letter to President Giorgio Napolitano begging to be allowed to end his life legally.

The Roman Catholic Church has a heavy influence on society and politics in Italy, where euthanasia is punishable by up to 15 years in prison.

Mr Welby’s widow Mina told reporters earlier that she had “a very strict Catholic upbringing” but that her views on end-of-life legislation changed over her 27-year marriage to Welby, who suffered from muscular dystrophy.

Welby was vice president of the Luca Coscioni association, which promotes euthanasia, stem cell research and similar causes.

Earlier today, a supporter of Mr Welby’s right-to-die campaign told AFP that the priest at Mr Welby’s San Giovanni Bosco parish “indicated that he had received instructions … to suspend preparations for the funeral because of the media attention around the affair”.

He “offered to do something else later, probably a memorial mass”, said Luca Coscioni vice secretary Rocco Berardo.

Meanwhile the all-news channel Sky TG24 reported that an autopsy determined that Mr Welby died of “cardiovascular arrest”, according to the head of Italy’s forensic institute.

He said the report had been lodged with state prosecutor and further analyses were still under way.

Footnote From “Choice”:   Why do Catholics allow themselves to be attached to a religious organisation that is without pity?  I am just so happy that my belief system took me right away from this type of kill joy where even those who’ve lost the most are penalised, the man’s family.  Perhaps the “religious” guy,  from the DNR documentary can explain this final cruelty to the rest of us.  Whether the media is involved or not should be irrelevant – what of the drug dealer Nguyen, given a full Catholic funeral in Melbourne’ St Patrick’s Cathedral.   A man who profited from dealing in heroin given a good Catholic send off, with a High Mass  – a man who dished out a painful living before an equally painful death.  The Australian Catholic Church weren’t shy about media involvement then with their line up of no less than twenty priests involved.  A man crying out in agony for death – denied it by the “rules” – common sense tells us to change the rules if the rules do not met the needs of a very great percentage of the world’s population.

 Hypocrites!      

Thank God for a compassionate doctor, who gave both the sufferer and the suffering family a beautiful Christmas Present.  


Dec 23 2006

Electricity

Tag: Diarymary @ 6:20 am

Seven hours without power yesterday throughout the day highlighted how dependent society has become on electricity.   The man next door with his electrified gates would have been in strife had he been home…. with wife and children….My computer has obviously survived, but the expensive ($85) surge protector I had installed was blown out……no computer, no kettle, no telephone, no fridge,  no TV or Radio, electronic bed left up as I was watching Midsummer Murders when the transformer blew outside the house at 8.30 am…Previously I’d watched “Tribe” and realised how simple village life could be. 

Now I have a couple of things to be happy about apart from the power being restored….that is.

We’re told that Philip Nitschke & Fiona Stewart’s book, The Peaceful Pill Handbook, will be available to the general public….wrapped in plastic and sold from under the counter.   Proof of age over 18 must be provided….

I can’t see how it can be sold easily if people are unable to be advised of its existence,  except within the inner circles of voluntary euthanasia advocates…..I disagree that the book promotes suicide methods, it provides information that might otherwise be misused.

The one thing the book will highlight is how difficult it is to die without medical assistance.  Terminal and chronically ill people do not have the strength or energy to be bothered with the seemingly complicated devices.   I own the book but wouldn’t race out and buy it, believing it will provide recipes for lethal doses of anything unless one is prepared to travel.    What the book does tell those with a pharmaceutical mind, an engineering mind, a statistical mind,  or just plain hope, what the possibilities are.  

What the writers have at their disposal,  is the resources to make the possibilities a reality.   Like salmon swimming upstream, Dr Nitschke and Stewart are promoting the concept of a peaceful pill, and by purchasing their book, we the general public help fund the possibilities.  

It says something about our society that The Peaceful Pill Handbook is treated with the same disgust provided to Pornography, in much the same way, the Suicide Prevention Law started out from stemming Pedophilia……Something dirty to be hidden, wrapped and ignored where ever possible….Perhaps we need a new word – away from suicide….especially targeted the market for which it is intended.

There is nothing shameful about wanting a good death…..

It has always been my view that with most rashes in society (the itch that won’t go away) is created by society itself.  Suicide occurs when people feel totally overwhelmed by their circumstances.    So many young people watch their parents tearing each other apart, in the domestic scene, believing somehow they’re to blame.   My Diary entry for December the 15th was heartfelt.   Even when parents have separated, many continue to score points off each other in front of the children.   They forget they once loved each other sufficiently to bed down together, have sex and give birth……they make their children pay for their own immaturity.  The man, I feel is often seen as the milking cow and I can understand their absolute frustration at their loss of placing within the family unit, and we don’t seem to want to work at relationships any more.   Get lost, but leave the cheque book!  

And -  then there is the need to strive and succeed and be the very best at everything….. just participating is not enough for the parents, their child must be first if they are to be respected.

I do believe that drugs and alcohol are a contributing factor also,  in that society has imbedded in our brains that we must always be happy, smiling and “doing something”.   The other night I watched an excellent TV program about the use of drugs in Israel and the stats were something like 7% USA, 4% Israel, and 3% Holland…..even the orthodox Jews admitted to using Ecstasy which surprised me, believing their faith would sustain them. (assuming again?)  One young lady was blaming the “Palestinians” for her dilemma and told the camera, if only she didn’t have to wake in the morning and share the world with them, she’d be right!…..  I wondered if the penny had dropped on any of the people interviewed that they are personally responsible for their “cop out” on life,  and where these 14 years were getting the money to supply their habits…..They mostly appeared to come from wealthy families and I felt that the Palestinians who would never see the documentary because of their own poverty, would have been appalled at their decadence,  And the Palestinians were the problem!

Yet really ill people are denied legal access to drugs that allow them to hallucinate and remove them from their very real physical pain.  A pain that won’t go away in the morning forever…….Alternatively society could give them the reassurance that a medically assisted death is available when the pain really becomes intolerable.

There is a book available “The Last Taboo” written by Suzane Fabian in 1986 which covers suicide among children and adolescents.  A handbook very focused on establishing the cause of suicide and how the people “left behind” coped.   The instruments and methods spoken of in The Peaceful Pill Handbook are not really what a young kid would be interested in…..knives, ropes, drugs, water – things that can never be banned are more accessible and immediate…we might not like that – but they are the facts.  

Preventing the depression and extreme sadness that an adolescent feels as a result of, in many cases, adult failures is the way to go….starting with full employment prospects with a proper wage, and an incentive to keep striving without the feeling of failure or blame.  Hope is the most important gift we can give our children.   Not to be used as a battering ram between warring parents and to know that just “trying” is sufficient motivation.      

In a throw away society, we stagger from one extreme to another.   Those who want to live, can’t,  and those who want to die, can’t readily.  By living -  I mean with the joy felt along with the dawning of of a new day.  I mean really “alive” not just breathing!

According to COTA News December 2006 statistics provided out of America show us that in 1999 of 35 million people aged 60+, approximately 6 million had a chronic disability, an improvement over 1982, when the figure of 6 million referred to a population of 27 million.

Being the cynic that I am though, I wondered whether the figures provided above were based on the same premise as Prime Minister of Australia,  Mr Howard’s employment figures where a person employed for one hour plus,  per week is classed as “employed”…At what point does a “chronic disability” gets reported as “chronic”….I know of people who live solitarily in “their own homes” when they should be living with a carer.  

Just this week I’ve called in a couple of times on a lady suffering with Alzheimer, and she just doesn’t have a clue….not even knowing her own phone number so I could ring instead of visiting in the absence of those who would usually look out for her….I couldn’t read the pencilled number beside her phone.    She knows that she is bored but is unable in her mind to step outside with her body into the fresh air,  to break the monotony of her days.   I have to tell myself, she is not my responsibility.  Alone in Australia, except for one son, she needs stimulation.   I hadto repeat the same thing six times in a visit – to me, the Alzheimer is a chronic disability…..speaking of which – I must remember to call in on her this morning sometime….I must remember to do that!!!   God, I hope I never develop Alzheimer but then I won’t know that I have,  will I?!

                                                                            _____

PS…. thank you to my anonymous contributor for your explanation….I feel so much more comfortable about the contents integrity now.  Please don’t wait too long to become actively involved though……this activism is not for the faint hearted, but my husband is resigned to my dedication.   Even now, as I receive my ALP Membership 2007 Renewal Advice I have to make choices. 

Life is full of important choices. 


Dec 19 2006

Two Cases of VE in an Australian State

Tag: Diarymary @ 6:21 pm

An anonymous shared insight into the ultimate act of love of a daughter for her parents.  I sincerely hope all traces will be gone from the source of the original email,  given that many days have passed since I received it.  I will not “reply” to the original email as it may be possible to trace a response through that avenue, given modern technology.  I suggest the writer never uses the email address again.   An informative email for which I am grateful the writer took time to pen to me.   I do confess to a sneaking belief that it was not written in an internet cafe, it is too well rounded and has taken all the issues surrounding an illegal act into consideration and addressed them.   Perhaps I am being “set up”.  I am trusting that the intention of the letter writer is to highlight the unbelievable efforts a person must go, to achieve a good death.     It all sounds so very familiar.  It could be out of a book.     A story repeated a hundred times, with varying degrees of implementation. 

The Law needs changing to accommodate the innocent who just happened to have been dealt the unlucky card of bad health – be they thirty or seventy.   Quality of life is more important to many people, than quantity of life.

The fact that the substance alluded to, Nembutal,   is not available, for prescribing by doctors (in Australia),  makes it extremely difficult to acquire.    I agree with the writer, the average frail, very sick differently abled person would have great difficulty in opening the bottle, even if one should have it available.  I can’t agree that it was the same substance as she speaks of, because the Documentary makers were very clever, from memory, in not filming the label because of legal concerns.

I smiled as I read of straining the fluid through to get out the rubber bits – rather like me picking up the used syringe in the car park and carefully washing it in Dettol to make it safe for use.  I thought to “find and buy a  heroine fix”  and I would automatically overdose never having had it in my life!  Wrong! -   And yes, swallowing 100 pills can make one vomit and also stuff up the kidneys, taking up to five days to die badly…which rather defeats the purpose……   Desperate people do desperate things!   What stupid ideas we think of!  

As the entire contents of the following email deals with voluntary euthanasia in the true sense of the word, I do not see myself at loggerheads with the authorities on the legislation dealing with suicide…..It does not incite suicide, but rather informs others based on a personal experience of implementing VE and how the debate for its use is going on, regardless of the law.   So much grief -  caused to normally “law abiding”  citizens needing to be deceptive – because the Law does not cater for the practicalities of the dying process once the body starts to break down. Love need not be challenged at this time in a person’s life.     Will the new 2007 Victorian Parliament bring us a Pro Choice Politician who will bring in a Bill to Parliament and have 73% of us, heard in the most important forum of all?  Where it counts – in Parliament.

Health and wellbeing far outnumber any peripheral consideration to the chronic or terminally ill.  No amount of inheritance can equate with the gift of health.   Progressive failing health is not something anyone can look forward to with a degree of calm and acceptance, if the truth be acknowledged by even the most ardent Pro Life Advocate.  Faith for some will sustain them while they suffer, but for people like myself, I see no point in suffering without “that light at the end of the tunnel”.

I share the daughter’s story with my readers.  Thank you to the writer for sharing this personal record of your life with other like minded individuals…..

To Mary Walsh:

“Two Cases of VE in an Australian State”

Hello Mary,

I am writing to you as a result of having seen you in the SBS program in which you were featured, which aired in November.

As you are a VE activist, there is probably not much I can tell you except for some personal experience of VE that I have. Nevertheless, I wish to share this with you, as you may find it useful.

Firstly, I should tell you who I am. Well, I cannot do that, as I have in the past broken the law in regard to assisting in VE and therefore I could be prosecuted.

To protect myself, I am sending this email from an Internet cafe using a hotmail account that I have created here today, so as to reduce the chance of me being traced. I am also aware of the Australian Law regarding electronic discussion of this matter. For that reason, I will not name specific substances or use official terms, in case scanning programs trace my email content. (However, the government may well be monitoring your email under the current law that came into force in January 2006.)

I will check this email address in a couple of week’s time in case you reply. It would appreciate any reply you are able to make, although understand if you cannot. I am happy for you to put this letter up on you web site if you want to. If you do that, there is no need to reply via email at all, as I will look on your site again in a few weeks.

I cannot prove to you that I am not a spy from the Right To Life organisation or some other organisation opposed to VE. On that you will have to take my word, although I hope that the details I provide herein will convince you that I am a supporter of VE, and write to you legitimately.

So, to get to the details, both my parents died via drinking the substance you acquired overseas. I was involved in both cases. The main point I wish to make to you is that the substance does provide a very quick and peaceful end. From the time of intake of the drugs until unconsciousness was only five minutes, and I estimate that death came less than five minutes after that. It was as though they had received an anaesthetic, they quietly went to sleep.

Firstly, my father, who had been healthy all his life, but also a heavy smoker, suffered a stroke. He was aged in his mid 70’s. This happened in the mid 1990s. He was left paralysed down the left side. Because it was a left-sided stroke (right brain), his speech was unaffected. Certainly his mind and reasoning were unaffected. He had no trace of dementia or Alzheimer’s disease.

From the day of his stroke until his death some months later, he was implacably determined to seek VE. My mother (they had been happily married for over 40 years) was of course devastated by his illness and distraught about the prospect his suffering without improvement, and of the possibility if his death.

Nevertheless, my mother assisted him (and in fact organised) the method for him to end his life. She contacted a person involved in VE who came to visit my parents in their house. This was very shortly following my father’s months-long stay in various hospitals after his stroke. This person spoke to the four of us (I was also present, as was my spouse) about the options, and also conducted a long discussion about the possibility of NOT seeking VE.

My mother, my spouse and myself all went over many times with my father his options, but no matter what we suggested, he unbendingly stated that he wanted to die, because his quality of life was unacceptable to him. He had also found his treatment in the hospitals very demeaning, with nurses having to wash him, wipe his bottom, and so forth.

Some people do recover after a stroke, but my father showed very little signs of recuperation. I think his age was against him in this regard. I know for example that the tennis player Rod Laver recovered quite well after a stroke, but Rod Laver’s occurred aged about 62. He was a fit sportsman too, which also probably helped his body overcome the stroke.

In any case, I digress, although I wanted to give you that background into my father’s health, and health prospects.

Through the VE contact my mother arranged, my parents were able to acquire the Mexican juice you obtained, and also a supply of one hundred sleeping capsules (or tablets? ?I can’t remember). This particular sleeping drug has a delicate margin of therapeutic use, and in overdose is lethal. One hundred tablets is such an overdose. Maybe you know what this drug is, but I am not prepared to name it here.

The person advised to use all hundred capsules (I opened them and combined the powder), mixed with yoghurt, and to eat this mixture. Then consume all the Mexican juice. In the end, this is what occurred (my father drank the Mexican juice without any dilution). He took the mixture around 9:15 PM on a weeknight (not a Friday night), so that next day would be a normal business day rather than a weekend, in order that the doctor would be available and so forth.

The required result was achieved very quickly. My mother lay with him on the bed and he went to sleep within five minutes. I had left the bedroom as soon as he consumed the materials, after firstly of course saying goodbye, which I had also done before he had taken the substances. I went back to my own house about an hour later, after trying to comfort my mother. (My spouse had not attended that night, staying at home to care for our children.)

Before consuming the materials, my mother and I again asked my father whether he was SURE that he wanted to go ahead. He expressed no flicker of doubt.

My mother then slept the night in the spare bedroom of her house and raised the alarm next morning when she found him dead in the bed, saying simply that she found him this way when she woke at 7am. (She slept in a separate room since his return from hospital, or at least that was the story.)


Certainly she did go into the other bedroom that night, rather than lie next to him after he had gone. Their usual GP signed the death certificate. The GP said that my father had probably had another stroke or heart attack in his sleep. Funeral arrangements then proceeded normally, with cremation used.

My mother had a note my father had written in his own (shaky) handwriting ?luckily he was right handed so could still write. It included the date. My mother could have produced this note, in case of any suspicion, or if the doctor was unwilling to write out a death certificate. When that did not occur, she destroyed the note, after the cremation.

Had she been required to produce the note, she would have said that she found amongst his papers after his death. The note simply said that he had planned the whole thing himself, had no assistance from anyone else, and apologised for having taken his own life, but felt he had no prospect of improving significantly and was not prepared to accept the quality of life that lay before him. That way, we were told, it would be very hard for any prosecution to occur.

My mother never remarried, nor ever had another man friend either before or after my father’s death. They had always owned everything jointly, so she had no monetary motive for wanting my father dead. She had absolutely NO motive at all. My parents had the perfect marriage. I believe my mother acted out of love, to shorten my father’s suffering, although for her to lose him was something she never fully got over.

My mother, my spouse and I all felt at the time that the situation was ridiculous. We are law-abiding people, and sought to assist a loved one in his hour of ultimate need. Yet we could all have been gaoled for our involvement, well perhaps not my spouse, who was not actively involved on the night, but certainly my mother and myself were actively involved.

I will now go into the circumstances of my mother’s death. This occurred in the last 12 months. My mother had been ill for many years with a degenerative disease. It was not cancer or any other strictly terminal illness. Over the past five years, she deteriorated quite markedly each year. In 2004, she became worse to the point where she started having trouble caring for herself at home (she lived alone, within 5 km of my house).

A few months before her death, she had a worsening of her condition, which required hospitalisation. She was in hospital for many weeks. When she came home, she was just barely able to cope, she had a lot of help come in, my spouse and I also stepped up our involvement, which had already been increasing over the past few years as she deteriorated.

She had quite a deal of pain, but pain was not the primary thing that caused my mother to decide that the time was now right for VE. She had talked about it for many years, saying that she knew that in the end she would decline to the point where her quality of life and future prospects were such that she would not wish to go on.

As with my father, we sought options. We offered for her to come and live with us, we offered for her to get a full-time nurse or live-in carer, we offered for her to go into an assisted retirement village. However she rejected all these, and abhorred the idea of a nursing home. As she said, she was barely able to move around in her house at home, because she felt so sick. What quality of life is there in that, she said? (As with my father, my mother, who was nearly 80 when she died, was absolutely mentally alert.)

Her recuperative powers were really terrible, worse than my father’s. She had been very slow to respond whenever she had been hospitalised with this illness (many times over the past decade particularly). This was in comparison to other patients, her specialist said. Unfortunately my mother had never been physically active (she had led a very sedentary life), and I think this really limited her body’s ability to bounce back.

Also, during the past year, she had a trans-ischemic attack (known in the medical world as a TIA), and whilst it does not generally do permanent damage as a full-blown stroke does, it is a warning sign that a full-blown stroke is possible.

My mother was terrified of a big stroke, which would leave her incapacitated, as it did my father. There was a little permanent damage in her case, as her handwriting became very bad and she had some difficult thinking of the correct word to use sometimes. This had not been a trait of hers beforehand. However, she remained rational and clear-headed. In short, she was definitely compos-mentis.

For someone wanting VE, there is a fine line to tread to know when the time is right. If you get too sick (for example, have a stroke and are hospitalised), then you lose control, as VE is virtually impossible whilst you are an inpatient. Certainly, relatives assisting would risk prosecution, as it is hard to set up the kind of scenario that you can at home. My mother was well aware of this.

So, in spite of many conversations about her future, she also seemed set on the idea of VE. She had wanted to travel to Mexico for some years, but had not been well enough. She went interstate four years ago, only just making it, through fatigue and generally being unwell, and frankly she could not in the last two years have even contemplated a trip on the local bus, let alone travelling overseas.

I had offered to go in her place and obtain it, but she would not consider it on the grounds that I may be picked up upon re-entry to Australia.

My mother had obtained a lot of the sleeping drug mentioned above through visits to various doctors. She planned to use that, but was very concerned that whilst it is effective, death generally takes about six hours. She did not want to die alone, and wanted someone (and there seemed no-one else except me who could do this, as only myself and my spouse knew her plans) to stay until she was definitely deceased, but could not see how this was possible. It seemed that the best time to use VE is about 9PM, when there is little chance of friends telephoning, and also it allows a good amount of time before the person is unexpectedly found dead in their bed the next day.
That makes it harder for the doctor to determine the time of death.

My mother had the quite unfounded fear, in my view, that she might wake up vomiting after taking the sleeping tablets and choke on her own vomit, or else the tablets might bring on a stroke rather than death, and without someone else present, she could be in trouble. She was adamant that she wanted someone in the house from the time of ingestion until death, so that any unforeseen possibility such as this would not arise. Nevertheless, she was a sick elderly woman; I did not want to argue with her that this was terribly unlikely. I also understood that she would want someone present, it is a hard enough thing to do, and doing it by yourself would, for many people, make it more difficult.

So this left us with the difficult scenario that I would have to stay at her house until around 4AM to wait and confirm that the drug had done its job.
This would be bad, as if I was seen leaving her house at such an odd time I could be implicated. Also, my car could have been seen outside her house during the night by a neighbour, again raising suspicion. Also my children would find it odd that I had not been in our house that previous night, even when they went to bed, which is usually not until 11PM or so. That would also probably draw attention the next day, after she was found dead.

Luckily, my mother had a contact who, when told of the problem, was prepared to supply one bottle of the Mexican juice to my mother. This was an incredibly kind thing to have done, as I suspect the bottle may have been the one that the donor had stored for himself or herself, for future use.
(This donor is healthy and does not need VE in the foreseeable future, but like other healthy people – myself included – likes to know that it is there and available, in case of unexpected illness.)

That is what happened, the donor supplied the Mexican juice, and no money changed hands – the donor absolutely refused any compensation for the cost of the bottle or for the cost of getting a replacement. A donation was given to a charity in lieu of any money changing hands, and the donor agreed to that.

So my mother just used the Mexican juice. She had read that it is totally effective just by itself. It is indeed incredibly effective, and it worked as I described above with my father.

On the chosen night, I went to my mother’s place as usual about 7PM (I had been in the habit of doing that since her illness). We opened the bottle very carefully. It was exactly the bottle I saw you flush down the toilet in Mexico on the TV programme. It had a little round metal seal, then the rubber cap. The rubber cap is very difficult to remove, as it is not designed for that, it is designed to be pierced by a hypodermic syringe. I had to struggle for quite some time with a small pair of manicure scissors to cut it, and even then some fragments of the rubber cap fell into the Mexican juice.

A sick person may have considerable trouble opening that bottle, you might want to be aware of that, although I suppose you know, from having opened it in Mexico.

I strained the Mexican juice through a tea strainer to remove most of the rubber pieces from it. We then diluted it 3 parts Mexican juice to 1 part Blackberry juice concentrate, to make it more palatable, added two teaspoons of sugar, and stirred. It was now in an ordinary kitchen tumbler, ready to drink. My mother tasted it, and said that it was drinkable (not too bitter). All this time I had also had an oven pan underneath the liquid when it was in the bottle then the drinking glass. (In case of spillage, the Mexican juice would be retrievable from the pan.)

So we went to the bedroom, where she got into bed. We said our final goodbye and she drank the entire contents of the glass. She was careful to handle the glass well after I gave it to her, so that her fingerprints would be well and truly on the glass after mine had been. SHE then put the glass in the bottom drawer of her bedside cabinet, and I did not touch it again.
I spoke to her about my love for her and my satisfaction with my life, and after a few minutes she lost consciousness, her speech slurring a little in the last few seconds before her eyes shut. It was very gentle.

The next morning she was found by the helper that came each day to assist her (the helper had a key to let herself in). The helper rang me, which was good, because I was, after feigning shock and surprise, able to tell her to ring my mother’s usual GP and not the ambulance. The GP came, arriving at my mother’s house before I did. By the time I arrived, the death certificate was already almost completed. He said she had suffered a heart attack in her sleep during the night. That was listed as the cause of death. With a death certificate, I was able to ring a funeral director and have the arrangements proceed as normal. There was never any hint of a problem here, nobody in the slightest suspected what had happened.

My mother had written a note in her own handwriting, which I was careful not to touch. (After her death, I realise she made the mistake of not dating it. I still have it, from the handwriting it can be seen that it written in her final two months – after her mini-stroke. When I go public with this story in some year’s time, as I plan to do, I will have the note as supporting evidence.)

The plan was that in case of any suspicion, specifically refusal by the doctor to sign a death certificate, I could, some days later, claim that I had found the note amongst my mother’s papers. It stated that she had gone down the VE path of her own accord and with no knowledge or involvement of anyone else.

That’s why it was important for her to leave the glass in her bedside cabinet – it stayed there whilst the doctor attended to her and whilst the undertakers came for her – in fact it stayed there until after the cremation. Then I finally retrieved it and threw it out.

We were advised to leave a scenario that would be plausible in the case where an investigation did take place. That’s why the Mexican bottle was simply disposed of in the kitchen bin, sure, it could have been found there in case of investigation, but it would be consistent with my mother putting it there. It could be reasoned that, alone, she opened the bottle, poured the contents into a glass, went into her bedroom and drank it, leaving the glass in her bedside cabinet.

No attempt should be made to wash the bottle for instance, or get rid of it, as that would imply outside help, we were told. Also, the person assisting should use no gloves. (It is possible to detect this during an
investigation.)

The overriding approach should be not to do anything that would not be normal. It would not be normal for someone to wear gloves in the house, so don’t. It would not be normal for a person about to die to wash up a bottle, so don’t. And so on.

Another tip is that when the person is found dead, you should call the usual doctor, not the ambulance. We made that mistake with my father. When the ambulance staff realised he was dead and not able to be resuscitated, they called the police. The ambulance staff then stayed until the police arrived. The police were then present until the doctor had signed the death certificate. Then only left then. It was an unnecessary and unpleasant complication.

Also, the doctor should have seen the person recently, as in that case they are more able to write out a death certificate immediately. In reduces the chance of an autopsy. A thorough autopsy can reveal the presence of Mexican juice. Both my mother and father ensured that they had a consultation with the GP very shortly before the appointed date they had chosen.

I realise that you personally may wish to not proceed in this covert way, because you prefer the role of a VE activist, but my mother wanted it the secret way. She felt that there was a societal stigma. She thought this stigma wrong, as she was not ashamed of her use of VE, but still wanted it this way, mainly, I think, to protect me. She also told me that she did not want her still young grandchildren to know that she had done this, mainly because it is against the law, and she thought they may not understand. When they are adults, my spouse and I plan to tell them about both their grandparents.

Anti-VE people who read this article may accuse me of matricide because I stood to gain financially from her death. She was not a multi-millionaire but was reasonably comfortably financially. It is true that I was a major recipient of her assets under her will.

All I can say to that is that I was already a fairly wealthy person, and the inheritance of my mother’s estate has not altered my way of life. I still live in the same house, work in the same office, catch the same public transport to work, and have not been (nor do I plan) any overseas travel.
I’ve not bought any boats, fast cars or other consumer items since her death.

The proceeds of my mother’s estate are in fact invested, with a view to giving my children a start when they become young adults. And that was always going to happen, whether my mother died now or in five or ten year’s time (given her condition she had no plausible chance of living longer, as research on the web regarding her condition, and her specialist’s opinion, will confirm). So there was no tangible overall benefit in her leaving us sooner rather than later.

The other point is that those who assist in VE are usually close relatives, so it is a no-win situation, as they can usually be accused of attempting to coerce the person into VE because of thoughts of the will.

However I know that I have a clear conscience in this regard. Both my parents absolutely and implacably wanted VE, and I was grieved to lose them.
I regarded it as an act of love that I could assist them in this final wish, after all they had done for me. I think the same is true for the vast majority of other people. In my view, very few people would want their parents dead prematurely.

If I were in your position, where your family appears to not be in agreement with your planned use of VE, I would check myself into a motel and do it there by myself. I do not think there is any chance of failure with the Mexican juice. That way, you can leave an open note, and your family does not need to be involved in the practicalities. It will only require a family member to identify you when your remains arrive at the mortuary.

There is a mountain of religious people who oppose you, please do not underestimate that. I believe that they are still very firmly in the minority of the general public. Although you and I fiercely disagree with these opponents, they are not stupid, and they certainly know how to mobilise themselves and campaign loud and hard for the outcome they want.
Their tactics is the most successful political tactic down the centuries:
the scare campaign. Works every time!

Also, be aware that putting material like this up on the web could lead to an opponent seeking to infiltrate the VE network and then blow the whistle.
But I still think that this material should go up and be made public, as people have a right to know you can use VE underneath the law and succeed, and also not leave a legal problem for your loved ones after you have gone.

Although you and I and most other people support VE, the opponents are very well organised and can mount a very loud campaign whenever the chance of legalisation arises. I do not think the law will be changed in my lifetime.

My approach, when my time comes, is to simply act in the way my mother did.
However I plan to get the Mexican juice myself (and for my spouse) well ahead of when I need it. Luckily, I have a way of getting it here in Australia, due to my line of work. I cannot be more specific. Maybe when I am older I will become a vocal advocate.

I think Dr Syme is the best spokesman the movement has, as he is articulate, measured in what he says, very intelligent, and only talks about the issue – he does not attack his opponent with personal abuse or trite cheap shots, as many of the anti-VE people do.

Best Wishes, and I think you are a remarkably strong woman for taking the stance you do.


Dec 15 2006

Victims of domestic violence

Tag: Diarymary @ 10:23 am

Choices in dying – some don’t have any choice at all….they are victims of domestic violence. 

At this festive time of year where normally “nice” rational people may imbibe just a little too much, I thought this Blue Ribbon Poem was timely.    Not only for a Three Year Old “Sarah”, but a child of any age!  And, then there is the partner!  

Excessive alcohol is very dangerous around children, like petrol and water, they don’t mix.   

My philosophy is that a physically weaker person cannot protect themselves from a bully.   Don’t become a victim, by never allowing the first blow to go unaccounted for.   Domestic violence should never be allowed to develop as a way of solving problems – Police, Stronger relatives may be solutions -  but never assume it is a demonstration of “caring” or “love”. “or “Sorry I didn’t mean to hurt you”….    Yes they did, and they do, and sometimes it is way too late after the event, to be “sorry”. 

In addition to alcohol,  when the unpaid bills from excessive spending, prior to Christmas,  start arriving in the New Year, creating anger and stress on an otherwise normally happy household.   It may appear “easy” to vent frustrations out on the kids, and the partner.

Sarah

My name is Sarah
I am but three,
My eyes are swollen
I cannot see,

I must be stupid,
I must be bad,
What else could have made
My daddy so mad?

I wish I were better,
I wish I weren’t ugly,
Then maybe my Mummy
Would still want to hug me.

I can’t speak at all! ,
I can’t do a wrong
Or else I’m locked up
All the day long.

When I awake I’m all alone
The house is dark
My folks aren’t home.

When my Mummy does come
I’ll try and be nice,
So maybe I’ll get just
One whipping tonight.

Don’t make a sound!
I just heard a car
My daddy is back
From Charlie’s Bar.

I hear him curse
My name he calls
I press myself
Against the wall.

I try and hide
From his evil eyes
I’m so afraid now
I’m starting to cry.

He finds me weeping
He shouts ugly words,
He says its my fault
That he suffers at work.

He slaps me and hits me
And yells at me more,
I finally get free
And I run for the door.
He’s already locked it
And I start to bawl,
He takes me and throws me
Against the hard wall.

I fall to the floor
With my bones nearly broken,
And my daddy continues
With more bad words spoken.

“I’m sorry!”, I scream
But its now much too late
His face has been twisted
Into unimaginable hate.

The hurt and the pain
Again and again
Oh please God, have mercy!
Oh please let it end!

And he finally stops
And heads for the door,
While I lay there motionless
Sprawled on the floor.

My name is Sarah
And I am but three,
Tonight my daddy
Murdered me.


Dec 14 2006

Dr Jack Kevorkian will be paroled

Tag: Diarymary @ 3:00 pm

Dr Jack Kevorkian will be paroled
Paul Egan / The Detroit News

Convicted suicide doctor Jack Kevorkian will be paroled on June 1, state officials and his lawyer confirmed today.

Mayer (Mike) Morganroth, Kevorkian’s Southfield attorney, said a three-member parole board panel unanimously granted Kevorkian parole after a hearing at Lakeland Correctional Facility in Coldwater last Thursday.

“He’s very pleased, he’s hoping it will be expedited,” Morganroth said.

Morganroth said he will push Gov. Jennifer Granholm to accelerate Kevorkian’s release date because of his poor health.

Kevorkian, who will be 79 in April and will have served more than eight years in prison by June 1, has diabetes, heart problems and a variety of other ailments.

He was convicted of second-degree murder for assisting a chronically ill patient who wanted to die.

            ________________________

“Choice”  is very pleased to have received this notification today.   I sincerely hope our ageing pioneer of voluntary euthanasia, a man of courage and great strength who basically laid down his life for the good of others, survives the indignities of confinement.  

Dr Kevorkian did pave the way for others to follow in two other countries and demonstrated first hand at the expense of his own freedom the need for sympathy and practical advice for end of life choices.   He would have been a role model for our own Australian Drs Rodney Syme and Philip Nitschke, among others.   

Should there be real justice shown, he will not have to wait another six months but will be released immediately to allow him to die among friends.   Given his age, how much blood of Dr Kevorkian does the American Government’s legal system want on their hands?   Nothing he did was for personal profit or gain…….Shame on the Michigan authorities that allowed an innocent man to suffer.

Let’s hope Dr Kevorkian can survive until his freedom is assured.


Dec 13 2006

Kids make this time of year for me.

Tag: Diarymary @ 1:42 pm

I have the honour of minding three small children today all under the age of five.   As I transported them back to my home, their happy chatter continued on the back seat of the car.   There was much discussion about Christmas, along with strange versions of Christmas Carols as little voices improvised.   One small voice said, “It’s Jesus’s Birthday now!”  Another said “yes He was born, then he died, they pinned his arms together and buried him with them!!”  At this point I asked the little girl if she attended “Sunday School”,  as she sounded quite well versed in her Religious studies….quick as a wink came back the answer….”No, I’m going to Primary School!”

Kids make this time of year for me.


Next Page »