In the one diary entry I have covered three States, Western Australia, Victoria and South Australia’s current events for choice and dignity in dying.
Hooray! Some common sense in coming into the parliamentary system even if it is in another State of Australia! Mind you, definition of “terminally ill” is, I believe, when death is expected to occur within a 6 month period. A resolution to this effect did not proceed past the desk of the Victorian Minister for Heath, Bronwyn Pike. (See the details of failed, December 2005 and May, 2006, State Conference Resolutions on the bottom of the opening page of this website. State Election November 2006 – Make legalisation of living wills an issue please).
Pity though there has to be ruling that no drug will be permitted to hasten death……must make people sufffeerrrr as long as “humanely” possible. Allowing a person to die is seen as a failure by the health system – we are yet to learn that “dying” is an absolute certainty arising out of living. Can one can be accused of standing by and watching an individual suffer needlessly and perhaps just as importantly, without purpose!…..no hope of a fulfilling life means departing the scene must be as prolonged and as difficult as possible!!! Refer to the case of Mark Leigep (details below:) whose Mother is suing the Royal Adelaide Hospital to allow her son to die more quickly than the authority would otherwise permit, under their “policy”. Bureaucracy gone haywire……(and what of the stress endured by the relatives?)
——————
Last Update: Saturday, June 17, 2006. 11:08am (AEST)
Mr McGinty says the laws are not a path to allowing voluntary euthanasia. (ABC TV)
WA Govt moves to allow ‘living wills’ for terminally ill The euthanasia debate is set to start up again in Western Australia as the Government introduces legislation for “living wills”.
The Government wants people to be able to make their own choice in writing on whether treatment for terminal illnesses can be refused.
It will lead to the first conscience vote in WA for many years.
State Attorney-General Jim McGinty says the new laws are not a path to voluntary euthanasia.
“This legislation will give an individual the right to say no to being artificially kept alive,” he said.
“Euthanasia is about taking positive steps to terminate a life. This bill does not allow that to happen.”
The WA Health Minister also says there is no intention to legislate for voluntary euthanasia, but advocacy groups say it is time for it to be considered.
The Greens are hoping to move amendments to this end.
The Government says the legislation would allow terminally-ill people to have their dying wishes respected, by medical staff, and by family members.
It would also provide legal protection to doctors who withhold or withdraw treatment.
The legislation would not allow for the administration of a drug or other means to end someone’s life.
Church reaction
The heads of the mainstream churches broadly accept the concept of living wills, including the Catholic Archbishop Barry Hickey.
Anglican Dean of Perth, Dr John Shepherd, says traditionally it would be that of respecting the sanctity of life.
“For us not to take a life or to induce the death of anyone at all, that is to preserve the quality of life and also the extent of life as long as possible,” he said.
“In a sense I can only speak for myself, and my instinct would be that a person’s wishes must be taken very seriously but there should be constraints.”
Dr Shepherd says it is important that no inappropriate action be allowed to take place.
But he also says voluntary euthanasia may be acceptable in some cases.
“It would certainly in my view administered only as a very, very last resort when it could clearly be demonstrated that the prolonging of this life involved such pain and suffering and loss of dignity that the end was appropriate,” he said.
‘Not far enough’
WA Voluntary Euthanasia Society president, Ranjan Ray, says the Health Minister should be going further.
“We are disappointed that he did not go just that far, it’s a step in the right direction, but just not enough,” he said.
He says he thinks that one day there will be legalised voluntary euthanasia.
“I’m absolutely certain of it, because there is public pressure on it, public demands it, and the more and more people are realising that there is no point in carrying on a life when all dignity is gone,” he said.
“They’re realising that and they will say that well, because of modern technology and medical sciences the people are kept artificially alive for a long time, at times without any meaning, without any dignity in life.”
It is a view that is shared by the Greens, who hold the balance of power in the Upper House.
Greens MLC Giz Watson says she will be seeking to make amendments that would allow voluntary euthanasia.
“We would want to actually have legislation that reflected a full choice – that is, that a person could choose voluntary euthanasia,” she said.
“I think it will be an interesting debate because every time we have a conscience vote in the Parliament, members speak a lot more freely, reflecting community attitudes and their constituent’s concerns.
“Polling would indicate that somewhere between 70 and 80 per cent of the population would like to seen voluntary euthanasia available.”
_________________
Lethal injection is murder, Adelaide Mother advised (Mark Leigep aged 31, brain dead and in a vegetative state can only be starved to death because a hastened death with morphine is Murder! – not a compassionate solution – but murder. We use the same terminology for a humane act as we do for a crime involving greed, sex, thrills, boredom, and of course, actions arising out of a sense of injustice. Perhaps the authorities need to consider a new word that covers love, compassion, peace, serenity and most of all, selflessness!
The Advertiser
WED 14 JUN 2006,
By CARA JENKIN
COURT proceedings would fail to allow critically injured car crash victim Mark Leigep to die, lawyers say.
It means Mr Leigep, 31, must remain on an artificial feeding tube for at least another four months, in line with Royal Adelaide Hospital policy. The legal advice has crushed the hopes of his mother Joanne Dunn, who had sought help from lawyers to end her son’s suffering as soon as possible.
But her eldest son Brian Leigep, 32, said he would fight to ensure his brother was given every chance to wake up.
Mark Leigep has been sustained by the artificial feeding tube since he suffered severe brain damage in a car crash at Elizabeth on March 26.He is breathing without the aid of a life support system but brain scans show he will never wake up.
His feeding tube was removed by doctors with the permission of all family members in April, but RAH administration demanded it be reinstated until at least six months after the accident. Ms Dunn said that when the time came for RAH staff to allow the tube to be removed, she would have to watch her son starve to death.
Lawyers have told her a lethal morphine injection would be considered murder under state law. “There is nothing more I can do,” Ms Dunn said. “I’d love to see Mark wake up and talk to me, but that’s not going to happen.”
Brian Leigep said he has been giving his brother physiotherapy to try to get a response. “I’m not fighting to keep him like this,” he said. “I’m not for keeping him in a vegetative state… I’m for doing everything possible and hoping to God that (Mark) would do something.”
Mother plans to sue: Please let my son die
The Advertiser
THU 08 JUN 2006,
By CARA JENKIN
THE mother of critical car crash victim Mark Leigep plans to sue the Royal Adelaide Hospital to let her son die, and for compensation. Joanne Dunn said yesterday she had been in discussions with legal firm Slater and Gordon, wanting to stop the hospital from providing life-sustaining treatment.
Mr Leigep, 31, suffered critical head injuries on March 26, when the car he was driving collided with a street sweeper at the intersection of Main North Rd and John Rice Ave at Elizabeth.
RAH doctors told the family the brain damage was so extensive that Mr Leigep – a single father of a four-year-old girl – would never wake.
Doctors removed his artificial feeding tube twice in the next month. It was replaced the first time after some family members disagreed with the decision to remove it. On the second occasion, despite having the approval of all family members, hospital administration intervened and ordered the tube replaced.
The family said staff had said there were legal issues and protocol had to be followed. Ms Dunn said her son’s static condition was causing major emotional distress in the whole family and she “just wants him to pass away”. “I just want Mark to be put to sleep,” she said. The latest brain scans have shown no improvement in Mr Leigep’s function. Ms Dunn said she would seek alternative measures to starvation to see her son die, including a lethal dose of morphine.
“I know if they let Mark go, there’s no way I can let him go by starvation now and see him waste away for another two weeks . I want to see him go quickly,” Ms Dunn said.
A spokesman for Slater and Gordon said he could not comment on the case. In May, a Health Department review into Mr Leigep’s situation recommended the RAH and family members be advised by the Public Advocate as needed to “address the challenging times they face”.
__________________
This morning I will join 100,000 people in a Work Choices Rally because although I am no longer in paid employment, I fear for the choices my grandchildren will be left with as thousands of jobs go off shore and people are expected to work for some $8 or $9 dollars per hour yet maintain the costs of an Australian government taxing system, at a personal level, GST and the petrol taxes, not to mention rates, rents, car maintenance, housing, food, schooling, health costs…..We have become a “service industry country” whose people need a realistic tangible base of employment to survive ongoing. We have neither a proper manufacturing industry which has all gone to China, India and anywhere else but Australia. Our defence system is being built on the left over droppings of the USA, and I’ve read somewhere that 80% of our food industry is from overseas! My grandchildren need choices for living, I need choices for dying……We all need choice for our physical and mental wellbeing to continue. Australia was once a country of Choice! Where the word “Imported” sounded exotic – now Australian Made is seen as a novelty!